Nelfinavir Shows Only Limited Success In Overcoming Revlimid Resistance In Multiple Myeloma Patients
Swiss researchers have published results of a small clinical trial testing whether nelfinavir, a drug originally used to treat AIDS, can overcome resistance to Revlimid in relapsed multiple myeloma patients.
The trial was motivated by previous research showing that nelfinavir can overcome resistance to Velcade, for a period of time, in many relapsed myeloma patients.
Unfortunately, the results of the more recent nelfinavir trial are not as encouraging as the previous research involving nelfinavir and Velcade. Less than a third of the patients in the more recent trial responded to the three-drug regimen of nelfinavir, Revlimid, and dexamethasone that they were given during the study. In addition, among the patients who responded to the treatment, the median duration of response was just four months.
It might seem encouraging that nearly a third of the trial participants responded to the treatment, given that all patients in the trial previously had been treated with Revlimid and experienced disease progression either while they were being treated with the drug, or shortly thereafter.
However, the participants in the trial had a median of just two prior lines of therapy, meaning in most cases that their disease was still sensitive to a number of additional treatment options.
In addition, the dexamethasone dose used in the trial was not incidental. Patients got either 40 mg or 20 mg of dexamethasone once a week for every week of the trial, depending on whether they were younger than 75 (40 mg) or not (20 mg). In patients with a median of just two prior lines of therapy, the dexamethasone alone could account for many of the responses seen in the trial participants.
Still, the researchers who carried out the trial believe the nelfinavir-Revlimid-dexamethasone regimen is “active” in patients with Revlimid-resistant disease, noting that, in addition to the 31 percent of trial participants who had at least a partial response to the regimen, another 38 percent had either a minimal response or stable disease for a period of time.
The researchers also point out that, to reduce the cost of conducting the trial, patients received at most four months of treatment with the trial regimen. Given that patients’ deepest responses to Revlimid-based treatment can occur after 6, 12, or even 18 months of treatment, more responses to the trial regimen might be observed in real life than were seen during the trial.
Despite these caveats, it seems likely that the innovative myeloma specialists who use nelfinavir to improve treatment outcomes for their patients will do so mainly by using the drug in combination with Velcade or, perhaps, other proteasome inhibitors such as Ninlaro (ixazomib). It is in combination with such treatments that nelfinavir seems to have the greatest ability to overcome drug resistance, potentially improving overall survival by improving the treatments physicians have to treat the disease.
(See this recent Beacon column for insight into why improving current treatments and adding additional effective treatments are key to improving the survival of myeloma patients.)
Background To The Nelfinavir-Revlimid Trial
Nelfinavir (Viracept) is an orally administered drug that belongs to a class of therapies called protease inhibitors. Nelfinavir was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 1997 for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the virus that causes acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS).
The original patent for nelfinavir has expired in most countries, so generic versions of the drug are now available (but not yet in the United States). Generic versions of previously patent-protected drugs have the same active ingredient as the original brand name drug, but they usually cost much less.
After laboratory research suggested that nelfinavir might be able to overcome resistance to proteasome inhibitors such as Velcade (bortezomib) in relapsed multiple myeloma patients, trials were carried out to explore whether nelfinavir in combination with Velcade and dexamethasone could improve treatment outcomes in Velcade-resistant patients.
The results of these trials were very encouraging. In a Phase 2 trial with Velcade-resistant patients who had received a median of five prior lines of therapy, 65 percent of the patients had at least a partial response to treatment with nelfinavir, Velcade, and dexamethasone (see related Beacon news article and myeloma specialist interview).
These results encouraged researchers to organize a trial to explore whether nelfinavir also could overcome Revlimid (lenalidomide) resistance in multiple myeloma patients.
Design Of The Nelfinavir-Revlimid Trial
Between May 2012 and December 2016, researchers at seven treatment centers in Switzerland recruited 29 relapsed / refractory multiple myeloma patients for participation in the trial.
To participate in the trial, patients had to be refractory to Revlimid, which was defined as having progressed during or within 60 days of termination of Revlimid-containing therapy of two or more months duration.
The median patient age was 64 years old. Approximately one third of the patients (31 percent) presented with high-risk chromosomal abnormalities (t(4;16), t(14;16), or del(17p)).
Patients had received a median of two prior therapies. All patients had previously received Revlimid and 83 percent had prior Velcade exposure. All were refractory to Revlimid, and 34 percent were double refractory to Revlimid and Velcade. More than half of the patients (62 percent) had previously received a stem cell transplant.
The Phase 1 part of the trial was designed to establish the target dose to be used in the Phase 2 part of the trial. Thus, during Phase 1, patients received between 1,250 mg and 1,875 mg of oral nelfinavir twice daily on days 1 through 21, 25 mg of Revlimid on days 1 through 21 plus 20 mg / 40 mg of oral dexamethasone on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 for up to four 28-day treatment cycles. Treatment was limited to a maximum of four cycles due to cost constraints.
A total of 10 patients participated in the Phase 1 part of the trial. The researchers observed two incidents of dose-limiting side effects at 1,850 mg of nelfinavir twice daily. As a result, in the Phase 2 part of the trial, all patients received 1,250 mg of oral nelfinavir twice daily plus Revlimid and dexamethasone at the same doses as in the Phase part of the trial.
A little more than half of the patients (52 percent) completed all four treatment cycles. The remaining patients discontinued treatment due to progressive disease (28 percent), unacceptable side effects (14 percent), or patient refusal (7 percent).
Results Of The Nelfinavir-Revlimid Trial
Overall, 31 percent of patients responded to treatment, with 10 percent achieving a very good partial response and 21 percent achieving a partial response. An additional 24 percent of patients achieved a minor response and 14 percent had stable disease.
Of the patients who were refractory to both Velcade and Revlimid, 40 percent achieved a minor response or better. Among patients who had high-risk chromosomal abnormalities, 78 percent achieved a minor response or better.
The median duration of response was 4 months.
The median progression-free survival was 3.4 month, and the median overall survival was 21.6 months.
According to the researchers, the treatment was well tolerated. They note that they did not observe any unexpected side effects, and that the side effects were similar to those observed with the individual drugs.
The most common side effects of all grades included gastrointestinal symptoms (31 percent of patients), and metabolic disorders (31 percent). The most common severe side effects included anemia (24 percent), low platelet count (21 percent), low white blood cell count (24 percent, including patients with low white blood cell counts accompanied by fever), and shortness of breath (10 percent).
For more information, please see the study by Hietz, F. et al., “Nelfinavir and lenalidomide / dexamethasone in patients with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma. A phase I/II Trial (SAKK 39/10),” in Blood Cancer Journal, August 27, 2019 (full-text) and the description of the nelfinavir-Revlimid clinical trial at clinicaltrials.gov.
Related Articles:
- Nelfinavir-Velcade Combination Very Active In Advanced, Velcade-Resistant Multiple Myeloma
- Dr. Christoph Driessen On Nelfinavir In The Treatment Of Multiple Myeloma
- Revlimid, Velcade, and Dexamethasone, Followed By Stem Cell Transplantation, Yields Deep Responses And Considerable Overall Survival In Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
- Adding Clarithromycin To Velcade-Based Myeloma Treatment Regimen Fails To Increase Efficacy While Markedly Increasing Side Effects
- Lather, Rinse, Repeat: Will It Work With BCMA-Targeted Therapies For Multiple Myeloma?
This research sounds interesting. I guess time will tell if it is a useful treatment for us.