Home » News

Darzalex (Daratumumab) Approved By FDA For Multiple Myeloma

16 Comments By
Published: Nov 17, 2015 1:10 pm

The United States Food and Drug Admin­istra­tion (FDA) has approved dara­tumu­mab for the treat­ment of multiple myeloma. The drug will be mar­keted under the brand name Darzalex. It is ex­pec­ted to be avail­able at U.S. treat­ment centers and doctor’s offices within two weeks.

The FDA approved Darzalex for use in multiple myeloma patients who have pre­viously been treated with drugs in both the immuno­modu­la­tory and protea­some inhibitor classes of ther­a­pies. Drugs in the immuno­modu­latory class in­clude Revlimid (lena­lido­mide), thalido­mide (Thalomid), and Pomalyst (poma­lido­mide, Imnovid). Drugs in the pro­te­a­some inhibitor class in­clude Velcade (bor­tez­o­mib) and Kyprolis (car­filz­o­mib).

More specifically, the FDA approval of Darzalex is for myeloma pa­tients who have received at least three prior lines of ther­apy, in­clud­ing both an immuno­modu­la­tory agent and a pro­te­a­some inhibitor, and for pa­tients who are “double refractory”, meaning their disease no longer responds to treat­ment with at least one immuno­modu­la­tory agent and at least one pro­te­a­some inhibitor.

The FDA approved Darzalex quickly. By law, the agency was not required to make a de­ci­sion on the drug’s approval appli­ca­tion until next March. In addi­tion, the FDA reached its de­ci­sion without formally consulting with its Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee of outside experts.

Both these aspects of the drug’s approval suggest that the FDA did not have any sig­nif­i­cant con­cerns re­gard­ing the drug’s safety and effectiveness, and that the agency believes Darzalex meets an im­por­tant medical need.

Darzalex is the second new myeloma ther­apy the FDA has approved this year, and addi­tional approvals may be on the way. The agency gave the okay to Farydak (panobinostat) in February (see related Beacon news), and it is reviewing approval appli­ca­tions for two other poten­tial myeloma ther­a­pies – ixazomib and elotuzu­mab (Em­plic­iti).

Darzalex belongs to a class of drugs known as mono­clonal anti­bodies. A number of mono­clonal anti­bodies have been approved for the treat­ment of cancer, but Darzalex is the first mono­clonal anti­body approved for the treat­ment of multiple myeloma. Darzalex binds to a protein known as CD38, which is commonly found on the surface of myeloma cells. Once bound to a myeloma cell, Darzalex attacks the cell while also signaling the patient's immune sys­tem to act against the cells.

Two other mono­clonal anti­bodies targeting CD38 are under devel­op­ment as poten­tial myeloma ther­a­pies: SAR650984 and MOR202. Elotuzumab is also a mono­clonal anti­body, but the drug targets a dif­fer­en­t pro­tein, not CD38.

Darzalex also is being reviewed by the European Medicines Agency for poten­tial approval in Europe. A European mar­ket­ing authori­za­tion appli­ca­tion for the drug was submitted in September of this year. A de­ci­sion on the drug's European mar­ket­ing appli­ca­tion can be ex­pec­ted by next spring, given typical time­tables for European regu­la­tory review of drug approval appli­ca­tions. (Update, May 24, 2016: Darzalex has been approved in Europe.)

Darzalex’s FDA approval is based partly on response data from the so-called Sirius MMY2002 trial. The Phase 2 study of Darzalex in­cluded patients similar to those for whom the drug has been approved by the FDA – that is, patients who received at least three prior lines of ther­apy, in­clud­ing both a pro­te­a­some inhibitor and an immuno­modu­la­tory agent, or who were double refractory to a pro­te­a­some inhibitor and an immuno­modu­la­tory agent.

The results of that study show that nearly one third of the trial par­tic­i­pants – who had received a median of five prior ther­a­pies – responded to single-agent Darzalex. The median time to disease pro­gres­sion was 3.7 months, and the esti­mated one-year over­all survival rate was 65 per­cent (see related Beacon news).

The most common side effects of Darzalex were in­fusion-related reac­tions, fatigue, nausea, back pain, fever, and cough. Darzalex may also result in low blood cell counts.

The warnings and precautions for Darzalex in­clude in­fusion-related reac­tions and inter­fer­ence with certain blood tests – in­clud­ing, in the case of some myeloma patients, the serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) and serum immuno­fix­a­tion electrophoresis (IFE) tests that help measure a patient’s response to treat­ment.

Darzalex is an in­fused ther­apy, and it will be avail­able in vials that come in two sizes: A smaller vial that con­tains 100 mg of the drug, and a larger vial that con­tains 400 mg.

The rec­om­mended dose of the drug is based on a patient’s weight ex­pressed in kilo­grams: 16 mg per kilo­gram. Infusions should be given once a week for the first 8 weeks of treat­ment, once every two weeks during weeks 9 through 24, and once every four weeks there­after.

Janssen Biotech, the Johnson & Johnson sub­sid­i­ary that will mar­ket Darzalex in the U.S. and overseas, has not yet made public the wholesale price that it will charge for each of the two Darzalex vial sizes. The com­pany is saying, how­ever, that based on the rec­om­mended Darzalex dosing, the cost per in­fusion will be $5,850 for a 176-pound (80 kilo­gram) patient.

This suggests that the wholesale price per vial of Darzalex will be $450 for the 100 mg vial and $1800 for the 400 mg vial.

It also means that, for a 176-pound patient, the cost of Darzalex treat­ment will be $23,400 per month for the first two months of treat­ment, $11,700 per month for the next four months, and $5,850 per month for each month there­after.

Additional details about the FDA approval of Darzalex can be found in this press release from the FDA and a related press release from Genmab, the com­pany that initially devel­oped the drug. The full pre­scrib­ing in­for­ma­tion for Darzalex is avail­able at the FDA website at this link.

Tags: , , , , ,


Related Articles:

    None Found

16 Comments »

  • Ron Harvot said:

    This is great news. The fact that it was approved so quickly points to its breakthrough status. With other monoclonal antibodies in development, this could be game changer.

    Of course, the cost of therapy is going to be very high, and that is always a concern.

  • Gil Siegel said:

    Keep those drugs coming, thank you very much!

  • Andrew said:

    I assume that it can be used off label for those who do not qualify under the FDA approval criteria.

  • JPC said:

    Hello Myeloma Beacon Staff:

    I just wanted to say that, for the multiple myeloma community, this is big news. The news division of the Beacon rose to the occasion. This is an excellently well written article. It covers all of the "NEWS" of this announcement, and informs the reader very very well. I learned a lot in the 3 minutes that it took me to read this. Great job.

  • Boris Simkovich said:

    Thanks for the comments, everyone.

    Andrew - Your assumption is correct. Physicians in the U.S. will have the option of prescribing Darzalex off label – just as they have the option of prescribing other myeloma therapies off label. It remains to be seen, however, to what extent insurance companies will be willing to cover such off label prescribing, and also to what extent physicians will be willing to prescribe Darzalex off label.

    JPC - We're glad you found the article informative. And, yes, the Darzalex approval is definitely important news for myeloma patients and caregivers in the U.S.

  • Maro said:

    Hello Boris

    Do you beleive that this could mean a close approval for Europe too?

  • David Finkelstein said:

    Thank you so much for this daratumumab briefing. This is great news! Your price estimates are very helpful.

  • Scott said:

    Does anyone know the back story on who developed the drug and how? I know one company bought the rights from the other, but I want to know who the heroes are who really made this happen ...

  • Boris Simkovich said:

    Maro - I wish I could say that the quick decision by the FDA in regard to Darzalex suggests that European authorities also will make a quick decision. But that would be very speculative. These sort of quick decisions just don't happen very often.

    David - Glad you also found the article helpful.

    Scott - From what we've read, the initial work developing Darzalex was done in the Dutch laboratories of the Danish biotech company Genmab, which also organized the first clinical trial of the drug.

  • Liss Hulsey said:

    I am praying it is as good as it sounds. My mom starts this today.

  • Joe courtney said:

    My doctor says the FDA approval is as single agent only. He says he cannot prescribe in combination with other drugs. Is this your understanding? I am Medicare patient, if that makes a difference.

  • Ken Miller said:

    This is "good news!" To God be the Glory.

  • Carol Nelson said:

    The article was so helpful. Thank you and thanks to the developers. I've been a myeloma patient for 5 years and start this treatment next week. We are hopeful the results will be positive.

  • John E. Smith said:

    I am curious about the length of infusion administration. Does it really take 5-7 hours? If so, then the installation of a port seems necessary. I am excited about the approval of Darzalex, but wonder about a half day in a hospital for infusion. Can anyone clear up how and how long the administration of Darzalex takes?

  • Linda Phillips. said:

    So happy the Myeloma Beacon is here for us. I have referred to it often over the last 13 years. My husband will be starting Darzalex on Thursday. It sounds promising!

  • Paul said:

    I have been on Darzalex for six weeks. After only one infusion, my free light chains plummeted to a healthy level. It seems like a miracle drug for me, after being on various other therapies for five years. The first treatment took over 10 hours, but with a lesser dose (1000 cc > 500 cc) in the following weeks, it typically has me in the clinic for 5-6 hours. I have a port-cath which is easier than getting a new IV every week. I look forward to less frequent trips to the clinic, starting after Week 8.