DCEP May Serve As Bridging Therapy For Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

Findings from a recent retrospective study conducted in Korea indicate that a combination of dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin may be a suitable bridging therapy for relapsed multiple myeloma patients who previously received treatment with novel agents.
Most patients responded to the combination as salvage therapy or achieved stable disease, but the response rates were not durable. Therefore, the researchers suggested that the combination might serve better as bridging therapy - to stabilize the myeloma until the patients receive further treatment, such as stem cell transplantation or access to investigational therapies in clinical trials.
These results are particularly relevant for multiple myeloma patients in countries where access to novel agents, such as thalidomide (Thalomid), Velcade (bortezomib), and Revlimid (lenalidomide), is restricted, and also patients for whom novel agents no longer work.
The retrospective analysis was based on data from 59 patients who received dexamethasone (Decadron), cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan), etoposide (VP-16), and cisplatin, commonly referred to as DCEP, as salvage therapy between 2006 and 2013. The median patient age was 58 years, and patients had received a median of three prior therapies, including at least one novel agent such as thalidomide, Revlimid, or Velcade.
Overall, 45 percent of patients responded to the treatment, with 2 percent achieving a complete response, 2 percent a very good partial response, and 41 percent a partial response. An additional 16 percent of patients achieved a minor response and 20 percent had stable disease.
The median progression-free survival was 3.7 months and the median overall survival was 8 months, which according to the researchers indicate that a durable response is hard to achieve with this regimen. Based on these findings, the researchers conclude that DCEP may be more suitable as a bridging therapy by stabilizing the disease for the next treatment.
The most common severe side effects were blood-related and included low white blood cell counts (92 percent), low platelet counts (76 percent), and low red blood cell counts (71 percent). Overall, 62 percent of patients discontinued treatment due to side effects.
The treatment-related death rate was notable at 15 percent. Nearly all of the treatment-related deaths were due to infection in patients with low white blood cell counts.
The researchers therefore recommend that patients being treated with DCEP also receive growth factors to increase blood cell counts and reduce the chance of infection.
For more information, please refer to the study in the Annals of Hematology (abstract).
Related Articles:
- Nelfinavir-Velcade Combination Very Active In Advanced, Velcade-Resistant Multiple Myeloma
- Stem Cell Transplantation May Be Underutilized In Multiple Myeloma Patients In Their 80s
- Nelfinavir Shows Only Limited Success In Overcoming Revlimid Resistance In Multiple Myeloma Patients
- Adding Clarithromycin To Velcade-Based Myeloma Treatment Regimen Fails To Increase Efficacy While Markedly Increasing Side Effects
- Selective Digestive Decontamination May Reduce Risk of Infection In Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplants
Thanks for this interesting article, Maike and Navneet. Although DCEP may work as 'bridging' therapy until a second ASCT could be done, or until the patient could get approved for a clinical trial, the high mortality rate of 15% and the need for use of GSF (granulocyte stimulating factor), makes me realize that is a harsher sort of treatment regimen than we are used to here. Also the DCEP did not serve as a 'durable' response, which is also disheartening. I really think that the way of the future for myeloma treatments is to get the newer novel agents more available on a world wide basis!
From my understanding, when clinical trials are run in a country, it is often meant as a prelude to applying for approval of that drug in that country. Access to clinical trials is not a given though, since usually there are only so many spots available on a trial. At least that is the impression I get, and I think that that is the limiting factor on signing up for trials, often. There are also strict criteria for each trial, and patients may not qualify for the trial, even if they are interested in participating.