Home » News

Daratumumab Continues To Show Promise For Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma Patients (ASH 2012)

One Comment By and
Published: Jan 9, 2013 12:37 pm

Daratumumab con­tinues to show promise for re­lapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients. Results from a Phase 1/2 study indicate that dara­tu­mu­mab may be effective and safe in heavily pre­treated patients.

In particular, dara­tu­mu­mab's activity as an anti-myeloma agent seems at least as good as that of the newest myeloma ther­a­pies.

“The response to dara­tu­mu­mab was accompanied by the clearance of myeloma cells,” said Dr. Torben Plesner from the Vejle Hospital in Denmark, who presented the findings from the dara­tu­mu­mab trial at the 2012 American Society of Hematology (ASH) meeting last month.

“Daratumumab has shown a favorable safety profile as a [single-agent ther­apy],” he added.

However, Dr. Plesner noted that the maximum tolerated dose of dara­tu­mu­mab had not been reached yet, and further trials are needed to assess its effectiveness in com­bi­na­tion with other drugs.

Daratumumab is being devel­oped by the Danish pharma­ceu­tical com­pany Genmab together with Janssen Biotech, a Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) sub­sid­i­ary.  The med­i­cine is a mono­clonal anti­body, a class of drugs that in­cludes two other poten­tial new myeloma treat­ments, elotuzumab and siltuximab.

Daratumumab binds to the CD38 molecule, which is found on the surface of multiple myeloma and other blood cancer cells.  Once dara­tu­mu­mab is bound to the CD38 molecule on cancer cells, it signals for the immune sys­tem to kill the cells.

Initial results of the current trial, which Dr. Plesner presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Meeting in June 2012, showed that 24 per­cent of patients had achieved a partial response to dara­tu­mu­mab (see related Beacon news).

The updated findings that Dr. Plesner presented at ASH were based on data from 32 heavily pre­treated myeloma patients who were in­eli­gible for stem cell trans­plan­ta­tion. Patients had received a median of six prior ther­a­pies. The median patient age was 61 years.

All patients had pre­vi­ously been treated with Velcade (bor­tez­o­mib), and 90 per­cent of patients had also received Revlimid (lena­lido­mide).

Patients received varying doses of dara­tu­mu­mab, ranging from 0.005 mg/kg up to 24 mg/kg for eight weeks.

Overall, 47 per­cent of the patients ex­peri­enced a reduction in M-protein levels in the blood or urine, which corresponded to the fol­low­ing response rates: 12.5 per­cent of patients achieved a partial response, 19 per­cent a minor response, and 16 per­cent stable disease,

Dr. Plesner emphasized that dara­tu­mu­mab was more effective at lowering M-protein levels when admin­istered at higher doses.

“At doses of 4 mg/kg and above, 67 per­cent of patients had a least a minimal response,” he explained.

Dr. Plesner added that “the pro­gres­sion-free survival also in­creased with longer exposure to dara­tu­mu­mab.”

Daratumumab's activity against myeloma in this early-stage trial compares favorably with what was observed in the initial dose-ranging trials for Kyprolis (carfilzomib), the most recently approved anti-myeloma ther­apy.

In the part of the Kyprolis trial (results; PDF) using the drug's current dosing schedule, a slightly higher share of the relevant patients (17 per­cent versus 12.5 per­cent for dara­tu­mu­mab) achieved a partial response.  However, more patients in the dara­tu­mu­mab trial (47 per­cent versus 38 per­cent for Kyprolis) ex­peri­enced stable disease or better.

Moreover, the patients in the Kyprolis trial were not quite as heavily pre­treated as those in the dara­tu­mu­mab trial.

According to Dr. Plesner, dara­tu­mu­mab also has dem­onstrated a favorable safety profile in its trial. “Daratumumab was surprisingly well tolerated,” he said during his ASH presentation.

Most of dara­tu­mu­mab's side effects were in­fusion-related, occurring within three to four hours of the in­fusion.

The most commonly observed severe side effects in­cluded dif­fi­culty breathing (3 per­cent), low blood cell counts (3 per­cent), and elevated liver enzymes (3 per­cent).

Going for­ward, Dr. Plesner and his colleagues plan to study the 8 mg/kg dose of dara­tu­mu­mab as a single-agent ther­apy and in com­bi­na­tion with other drugs.

For more in­for­ma­tion, please refer to abstract 73 on the ASH 2012 meeting website, as well as Dr. Plesner’s presentation slides, which he has made avail­able for download and viewing as a courtesy to the Beacon’s readers. For more in­for­ma­tion re­gard­ing clin­i­cal trials studying dara­tu­mu­mab, please visit the clinicaltrials.gov website.

Photo by IndyDina with Mr. Wonderful on Flickr - some rights reserved.
Tags: , , , , , ,


Related Articles:

One Comment »

  • nancy shamanna said:

    Thanks for the two articles this week about antibody therapy. The two drugs, Lorvotuzumab and Daratumab sound as if they are effective. The lorvotuzumab drug was used on patients who showed the marker on Myeloma cells, CD56, whereas the Daratumab worked on the CD38 marker. Lorvotuzumab was an 'antibody-drug' conjugate (ADC)...was the Daratumab also an ADC?

    It is interesting that these new antibodies were grown in mice first. Can you elaborate as to how they could be made for 'mass production'?

    One last question...do all myeloma patiients show both the CD56 and the CD38 proteins on the myeloma cell coats?

    Thanks Maike and Navneet for this. Also, the slide presentations were very good...they help one to visualize how the research project was done. As a novice reader, I find them to be helpful.