Guide To Clinical Trials For Multiple Myeloma Patients – Part 2: Benefits And Risks Of Clinical Trials

by
Published: Apr 24, 2010 9:28 am
Guide To Clinical Trials For Multiple Myeloma Patients – Part 2: Benefits And Risks Of Clinical Trials

This guide, which will be published as a series of articles over the next couple of weeks, is intended to help clarify the clinical trial process and to answer common questions so that you can decide whether a clinical trial is the right option for you. The guide will explain the different types of clinical trials, address common concerns, provide answers from physicians to common questions, describe patients’ clinical trial experiences, and provide resources for finding a clinical trial.

If you are considering participating in a clinical trial, it is important to be entirely comfortable with your decision. Here are some benefits and risks associated with clinical trial participation that should help you during the decision process. The most important thing, however, is whether the treatment regimen being studied is the best option for you. Your physician can help you determine this.

Why are clinical trials important?

Not only do clinical trials offer new treatment options for you, but they are also (in the long run) helping further research for the benefit of many patients in the future. It takes a significant number of people who are willing to participate in order for disease research and treatment development to move forward, but every person counts and adds to the culmination of knowledge.

It takes years of preparation and research for one treatment to reach the market. Without the help of clinical trial participants, advances in treatment could not be made.

By taking part in a clinical trial, you can try a new treatment that may or may not be better than those that already exist. But in addition to receiving the treatment that you have decided is best for you, you can also help doctors and researchers better understand how the treatment works in people of different races, genders, ages, and stages of disease.

Potential benefits of participating in a clinical trial

  • Health care provided by leading physicians in the field of cancer research
  • Access to new drugs and interventions before they are widely available
  • Close monitoring of your health care and any side effects
  • A more active role in your own health care
  • You may be among the first to benefit from a new treatment
  • An opportunity to make a valuable contribution to cancer research.

Clinical trials are known for their meticulous detail and observation. So you will get the same, if not better, care and attention that you would get during regular treatment. There are frequent visits with your physician to provide thorough examinations. There are also various ways to record your everyday symptoms and to track your progress, such as diaries and hotlines. This allows the research coordinator and physician to physically see the progression of your symptoms and whether the treatment is having any effect.

Common reasons to participate in a myeloma trial

Relapsed or refractory patients are most likely to participate in a myeloma clinical trial because they are not responding to established therapies and are looking for new methods of relief.

If a patient is not responding to standard treatment and their quality of life is poor, there may not be many options left to exhaust. For those who have tried various treatments without results, clinical trials and their treatments offer new hope.

Potential risks of participating in a clinical trial

  • New drugs and procedures may have side effects or risks unknown to the doctors
  • New drugs and procedures may be ineffective, or less effective, than current approaches
  • Even if a new approach has benefits, it may not work for you.

Common reasons patients choose not to participate in a myeloma trial

Some patients may choose to continue trying established treatments that have been proven to work on other patients because those treatments have already been assessed for efficacy and safety factors. Unknown short term and long term side effects are one of the many reasons that patients choose not to participate in trials.

There is also a lifestyle factor. Participating in a clinical trial may not suit some patients' lifestyles (i.e. too much traveling, too many doctor’s visits, unexpected financial troubles, etc.).

Another reason is a comfort level that patients feel with their doctors in a more private environment and a nervousness associated with switching to a different doctor and to a new environment. Additionally, local physicians may not be inclined to refer their patients to clinical trials at research institutions.

“Because of the infrastructure of clinical medicine in the United States, many patients are treated by local oncologist/hematologists in their private practice. The incentives for these physicians to keep their patients in their clinics (rather than referring them to trials elsewhere) are quite strong,” said Dr. Ola Landgren, a clinical trial investigator at the National Cancer Institute.

“Patients diagnosed and treated at larger research institutions have a different situation; i.e. the number of available trials is larger.” Physicians at research institutions may be eager to suggest clinical trials to their patients.

To learn more about clinical trials, please read Part 1 and check The Myeloma Beacon in the coming weeks for the other articles in the series.

Photo by Lisa Brewster on Flickr - some rights reserved
Tags: , ,

Related Articles:

2 Comments »

  • Gary Blau said:

    A major disadvantage of randomized clinical trials is the necessity to follow a protocol (generally designed in consultation with a biostatistition) so that statistical significant conclusions can be drawn on different arms of the trial so that physicians can pretty figures at national meetings. Consequently, they are reluctant to change treatment regimens despite labs, toxicities,and/or efficacy clinical results which suggest otherwise.

    In the development of new drugs by the FDA, such archaic randomized clinical trials are on their way out being replaced with the more patient compliant adaptive clinical trials where the protocols for the patients are modified as clinical data becomes available. Such an approach allows the physician to provide the best treatment for the patient unhampered by the restrictions of the classical randomized protocol.

    I hope this will happen in the MM community.This would be another giant step in the progress to personalized medicine for the treatment of MM.

  • Saniya Tabani (author) said:

    Hi Mr. Blau! Thank you very much for your comment. We at the Beacon truly appreciate the additional information and your thoughts on this matter. We hope that there will continue to be advances in the way clinical trials are done in order to best suit patient's needs.