Home » Opinion

The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Myeloma Beacon or its staff.

Myeloma On The High Plains: Pa ti l Inf  ma ion

6 Comments By
Published: Mar 3, 2020 6:14 pm

The late great comedian George Carlin used to have a routine where he played a sportscaster doing the nightly sports report after having had one too many [you can fill in the blank]. About halfway through this routine, the loopy sportscaster would announce, “And here is a partial score from Yankee Stadium: New York 3.”

Huh? I chuckle when I think about that line because I believe that it so describes living with multiple myeloma.

Partial everything is how we live. Partial in­for­ma­tion is the norm. Don’t get me wrong, I am not com­plain­ing. I am just pointing out the basic fact that partial in­for­ma­tion is all that is avail­able. And that takes some getting used to. My engi­neer­ing undergraduate degree pencils me in as someone who likes com­plete, exact, and repeatable answers. The adaptation to partial answers, partial in­for­ma­tion, and partial out­comes has come with some chal­lenges.

A sample of some basic questions that re­ceive partial answers / in­for­ma­tion starts with: How bad is it? What should I ex­pec­t during treat­ment? How long will I have this port in my chest? When will I start feeling better? When will my hair fall out? When will my hair grow back? Why does everything smell so bad? How long do I have to take all of these pills? What kind of side effects can I ex­pec­t?

All of these are basic questions that usually are answered with some form of qualifying state­ment by the expert, letting us know that it is just a best esti­mate.

Most, if not all, of the of time, there is no one set answer or re­sponse that can accurately satisfy the desire for a more definitive picture. For instance, we may get a re­sponse to a question based upon how our doctor perceives we respond to in­for­ma­tion, or maybe based upon the current status of our cancer. Or, maybe yet, we get a re­sponse based upon the most recent clin­i­cal trial. Whatever the reason, we get a lot of “New York 3” type re­sponses.

But partial in­for­ma­tion can still be ap­pre­ci­ated. It is better than no in­for­ma­tion. It provides us with a notion that someone knows some­thing about what is going on. And partial in­for­ma­tion leaves room for interpretation. Or maybe I can write: "It leaves room for hope."

“I hope that the in­for­ma­tion I just read does not apply to me because it is not to my liking,” or maybe “I hope that it does apply to me because it is good news.”

Information that makes me worry or is not to my liking goes down easier by under­stand­ing that what I just read or heard is not exactly my situation. It did not con­tain all of my in­for­ma­tion, so it may not apply. All they have is partial in­for­ma­tion. I must remember that pub­lished data and results do not in­clude my particular cir­cum­stance.

When listening over the telephone to the nurse reading the side effects of Revlimid (lena­lido­mide) as an order is being filled and sent out can get scary because any­thing and everything that can go wrong is mentioned. However, and this is a big how­ever, it is all based upon partial in­for­ma­tion. They do not have my “specifics.” They do not know exactly what my re­sponse to the med­i­ca­tion will be. It could be this way, or it could be that way, or it could be both. We sort of know what is going to hap­pen, but not really. It is all based upon partial in­for­ma­tion.

Steroids? Who among us can say for sure how any of us will respond? My oncologist told me that the wife of a patient called him one evening very con­cerned that her husband (who had multiple myeloma) was jumping up and down on the bed naked. She did not know what to do. He calmly asked her if he had taken his steroids during the day. She in­di­cated that he had. Well, he told her, “Make sure the drapes are closed, no glass is in close proximity to the bed, and enjoy the show.” He was reminding her that no one can predict with total cer­tainty the side effects of steroids.

For me, taking five little steroid pills on Friday morning results in a Saturday morning routine that can and has in­volve­d, in varying degrees, me detailing the car, work­ing out, making the evening’s dinner, and taking care of the laundry all before my wife wakes up (which is usually around 7:30 am). So far there has been no jumping on the bed.

Partial in­for­ma­tion. Partial answers. Partial this and partial that. No one knows. Our choice is in how we respond to all of the “partial.”

George Carlin may have been more than a comedic genius with his “New York 3” routine. He may have been helping to prepare us for a multiple myeloma lifestyle. But then again, who knows? We only have partial in­for­ma­tion.

Mark Pajak is a multiple myeloma patient and the newest columnist here at The Myeloma Beacon. His column is pub­lished once a month.

If you are interested in writing a reg­u­lar column to be pub­lished by The Myeloma Beacon, please contact the Beacon team at .

Photo of Mark Pajak, monthly columnist at The Myeloma Beacon.
Tags: , ,


Related Articles:

6 Comments »

  • Kristen Sawyer said:

    This was a great article for me. Before retiring, my career was in medical research, and I completely understand the search for complete information. As I help my husband cope with and understand multiple myeloma and the treatment, I become an information hound. I find the partial information very frustrating. You hit the nail on the head!

  • Patty Nolan Bodin said:

    Thank you Mark! Your column was entertaining as well as enlightening. It provided a perspective that we had not considered. Partial information can be a two-edged sword. On one hand, some information seems better than no information, but then sometimes it can cause undue anxiety. As you mentioned, no one can tell us how long “remission” will last, how susceptible we are to infections, or what the reaction to a new drug will be. We have to continue to live our lives with partial information and hope that we are realistically weighing the pros and cons of each decision. Again, we appreciate your insight.

  • Susan Mandel said:

    Oh my gosh, I had to read your article to my husband. We had such a good laugh over the guy jumping on the bed!!!

  • Nancy Shamanna said:

    Thanks for the interesting column, Mark! The unknowns in life seem to loom large sometimes when thinking about myeloma. I think that my worries right now centre around having a low immunity level, and trying to avoid getting infections. I have had some strange moments when on dex. Once I almost let a dog eat one of my gloves. The owner was quite upset with me since her dog is always trying to eat items and she gets his stomach pumped! Later I explained about the situation and now we talk a lot about her dog, but I am careful not to let it grab my gloves. Another time, I was walking with a pointed stick, like a ski pole, to get over icy sidewalks. I told a couple I was using it to protect myself against coyotes! We got into a heated discussion about coyotes, which do annoy me since they run in a pack in the woods nearby. These folks were very sympathetic to coyotes. I had to apologize to them too afterwards!

  • Daryl Olson said:

    My wife and I have laughed for days over the guy jumping on the bed. So funny, especially for those who have taken huge doses of steroids. Thank you for sharing.

  • Patty Muckala said:

    Mark, your column cracked me up! I had forgotten George Carlin’s routine, so it brought fun memories! He was, indeed, a crazy man! I enjoy reading your column as I think we are pretty much on the same drugs.

    I’ve been in remission for almost four years since my transplant and have taken Revlimid on my maintenance plan. Recently, my oncologist put me on the lowest dose, which frightens me. If my multiple myeloma finds away around the drug at this lower dose, he will have to change it to a different drug, which will bring new side affects and a new set of worries. My choice was either this or to go off completely, which, even though that is my fervent wish, terrifies me. I guess it is the thought of the cancer coming back, which I know it will one day, and not being able to get back to total remission once again. The partial information of “that would be our goal,” when I asked about getting back to total remission, is exactly what you are talking about in this column.

    It’s comforting to know that we are not alone as we deal with our new normal. Thanks for that!