Thank you for clarifying. I missed that point. Sorry.
Without seeing the films it is difficult to say with certainty. However, I would state that multiple lytic lesions is consistent with active disease and, as stated in other posts, she would be appropriate for therapy. The CRAB-I criteria (linked to multiple myeloma) are the major barometers for the initiation of therapy. Marrows are not perfect (a small sample of a large marrow), but are important.
I would recommend that one consider a repeat marrow biopsy (on the other side), undergo a PET/CT to assess disease (with multiple focal lesions, I would also be concerned about extramedullary disease [plasma tumors outside the marrow]), and consider a referral to a myeloma center for another opinion.
If the lesions are not large and she is without other CRAB-I, she is not in immediate danger, but should discuss with her oncologist or see a multiple myeloma specialist sooner rather than later. If already being seen by a multiple myeloma specialist, it may just be his/her opinion that she can be monitored for a time before initiating therapy, delaying therapy for a time. In my clinic, she would be getting therapy with multiple lytic lesions.
Thanks again for clarifying.
CRAB-I = Hypercalcemia, renal failure, anemia, boney lytic disease, and serious infections (in my book).
Forums
Re: Why do bone marrow biopsy?
Thank you Dr Shain!
-
Lillyput189 - Who do you know with myeloma?: Self
- When were you/they diagnosed?: MGUS 2011, multiple myeloma 2014
- Age at diagnosis: 54
12 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2