The Myeloma Beacon

Independent, up-to-date news and information for the multiple myeloma community.
Home page Deutsche Artikel Artículos Españoles

Forums

Discussion about multiple myeloma treatments, stem cell transplants, clinical trials, alternative medicines, supplements, and their benefits and side effects.

Re: Anyone with t(4;14) who did NOT do an SCT upfront?

by Mark11 on Sun May 31, 2015 6:53 pm

Also note that the statistical analysis was based on intention to treat analysis. It does not look like there is data for the per-protocol group (those that actually completed the assigned therapy).

"Randomized controlled trials often suffer from two major complications, i.e., non­compliance and missing outcomes. One potential solution to this problem is a statistical concept called intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. ITT analysis includes every subject who is randomized according to randomized treatment assignment. It ignores noncompliance, protocol deviations, withdrawal, and anything that happens after randomization. ITT analysis maintains prognostic balance generated from the original random treatment allocation. In ITT analysis, estimate of treatment effect is generally conservative. A better application of the ITT approach is possible if complete outcome data are available for all randomized subjects. Per-protocol population is defined as a subset of the ITT population who completed the study without any major protocol violations."

Reference:

SK Gupta, "Intention-to-treat concept: A review," Perspectives in Clinical Research, 2011 (full text of article)

Mark11

Previous

Return to Treatments & Side Effects