About 6 weeks ago I rushed to Sutter Health hospital in San Francisco after learning that my kidneys were failing for some unknown reason. I spent the next four days there while they tried to figure out what was happening to my kidneys, which were operating at about 10%.
They ran all kinds of blood tests, MRI’s, etc., and did a kidney biopsy (and received partial results within a few days), but couldn’t figure out what was going on after almost 5 weeks. All the while I've been on prednisone, which has improved my kidney function but now that has plateaued.
One reason for the delay was the biopsy results in that Sutter Health had a competitive relationship with the UCSF so they had to send my test out of state to Washington University.
But I finally learned two days ago that I have Stage 2 multiple myeloma from my new oncologists / hematologists at Sutter Health. This brings me to my question.
I am thinking that I should consider getting a second opinion and possibly switching to USCF for the following reasons:
- Through research they appear to be an academic university and more renowned in the field than Sutter Health
- They do stem cell transplants and Sutter Health does not, so I will eventually need to go to UCSF anyway. I’m 48 year old and pretty healthy otherwise. My onc has told me that I should plan on a transplant. It seems to make sense to get all treatment at one place.
- I am concerned that Sutter first told me it wasn’t cancer, and then took almost 5 weeks to figure out that it was. My confidence in them is a bit shaken.
Thanks to everyone for reading!