The Myeloma Beacon

Independent, up-to-date news and information for the multiple myeloma community.
Home page Deutsche Artikel Artículos Españoles

Forums

Questions and discussion about monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (i.e., diagnosis, risk of progression, living with the disease, etc.)

MGUS since 2012 - understanding my lab results

by Egran on Sat Mar 07, 2015 3:34 pm

I was diagnosed in November 2012 with MGUS after having much blood work done to diag­nose a fever that I had for 25 days. Along with finding out that I had mononucleosis (at 56 years old!), MGUS was also diagnosed.

I was already seeing an oncologist because I am in the cancer risk evaluation program. I am high risk for breast cancer. I will, however, be making an appointment with a myeloma spe­cial­ist at HUP in Pennsylvania shortly.

I am still trying to understand MGUS. Any help in interpreting my labs would be appreciated.

Hemoglobin 15.2 Range 12.0-16.0
Creatinine 0.86 Range 0.44-1.03
Calcium 9.5 Range 8.9-10.3
Vitamin D 29.9

M Spike: IgG Lambda

Levels from 2012 until now (g/dL):
0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5

Total Protein Electrophoresis Levels (from 2012 until now)

7.8 7.3 6.9 7.0 7.4 7.2 7.0 Range 6.1-8.5

Immunoglobulin Levels (from 2012 until now)

IgA 347 197 141 136 134 123 130 Range 40-350
IgG 1626 1509 1198 1171 1079 1192 1117 Range 650-1600
IgM 171 44 23 22 31 27 24 Range 50-300

K:L Ratio Levels (from 2012 until now)

1.92 2.14 1.59 1.90 1.556 1.582 1.836 2.227 Range 0.300-1.600

Urine Protein Electrophoresis Level from October 2013
Urine protein (mg/dl) Value 6 Range < = 9

Urine protein electrophoresis shows no evidence of a paraprotein
Immunofixation has not been performed


I have not had a skeletal survey or bone marrow biopsy.

My last dexa scan in January 2014 read:

Normal mineralization of the entire hip score demonstrating a 7.6% improve­ment in bone mineral density and osteopenia of the spine demonstrating a 12% in­terval improvement in bone mineral density.

With these labs, should I be concerned with:

  1. IgM levels that keep lowering? What does this mean?
  2. K:L ratio that is higher?
  3. M-spike level?
Doctor tells me he does not see any concern for myeloma right now. I just feel that I need a better understanding.

Egran

Re: MGUS since 2012 - understanding my lab results

by TerryH on Sat Mar 07, 2015 4:56 pm

Hello Egran,

Welcome to the forum.

You are tracking just about all the key numbers you should be keeping tabs on. The only values that I would add to your list, off the top of my head, are the actual levels of your free light chain levels (that is, your lambda and kappa levels). The kappa and lambda levels are what are used to calculate the K-L (kappa-lambda) ratio, but they are important in their own right.

Do you have those values?

One other thing for future reference: It's good to include units with most results because they can vary from lab to lab and, especially, from country to country (there are people here in the forum from many different countries).

The numbers I would suggest you pay particular attention to are:

M-spike (from SPEP), serum free light chain levels and ratio, immunoglobulin levels (IgG, IgA, IgM), hemoglobin, creatinine, and calcium levels.

(I may be missing a lab result or two, but I don't think you can go wrong tracking those results.)

TerryH

Re: MGUS since 2012 - understanding my lab results

by Egran on Sat Mar 07, 2015 8:48 pm

TerryH,

Thank you

Yes, I have kappa and lambda levels. They have always been within the normal range.

I am concerned about my IgM levels lowering.

Egran

Re: MGUS since 2012 - understanding my lab results

by TerryH on Sun Mar 08, 2015 5:39 pm

Hello Egran,

Okay, let's step through this.

First of all, your M-spike is relatively low and has been basically constant since your diagnosis. That's obviously a good thing!

Second, your kappa-lambda ratio is outside the normal range. That could have an influence on your risk of progressing to multiple myeloma, although your risk is still very low.

You probably already know this, but the standard model for categorizing MGUS patients into different risk levels for progressing to multiple myeloma is based on a study by the Mayo Clinic. It includes three risk factors:

1. Non-IgG isotype
2. Serum M protein greater than 1.5 g/dL
3. Kappa/lambda or lambda/kappa ratio being skewed, or out of normal range.

For patients with 0 of these major risk factors, the risk of progression at 20 years is 5%. For patients with 1, the risk factor is 21%. For those having 2 of these conditions, it's 37%, and for those meeting all three of those criteria, it's 58%.

(See this forum posting for more details.)

Your MGUS "isotype" is IgG lambda, and your M-spike is less than 1.5 g/dL. So you don't have either of those two risk factors. However, your kappa-lambda ratio is out of the normal range, so you have that one risk factor, which increases somewhat your probability of progressing to multiple myeloma.

Remember, however, that we're talking probabilities here. Each individual patient is different.

Finally, there is your below-normal IgM level.

IgM is one of your "uninvolved" immunoglobulins. Your "involved" immunoglobulin is IgG. The technical term you sometimes will see for having one or more uninvolved immunoglobulins below the normal reference range is "immunoparesis."

There are some studies that suggest that immunoparesis may increase an MGUS patient's risk of progressing to multiple myeloma. See, for example, this study:

I Turesson et al, "Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and risk of lymphoid and myeloid malignancies: 728 cases followed up to 30 years in Sweden," Blood, Jan 16, 2014 (link to full text)

However, my sense is that this is not a settled issue, and I think one reason it isn't is because immunoparesis often occurs in MGUS patients who also have abnormal kappa-lambda ratios. In this Italian study, for example, two thirds of the MGUS patients who had immunoparesis also had abnormal kappa-lambda ratios.

M Pezzuti et al, "Association Between Immunoparesis and a Skewed Free Light Chain (FLC) Ratio: A New Prognostic Factor Of Progression from MGUS To Multiple Myeloma?", Blood, Nov 15, 2013 (link to abstract)

Also, half the MGUS patients in the study had immunoparesis.

So it's not clear to me that you need to be too concerned about the low IgM level in terms of any potential sign it may be of an increased risk of progression.

IgM is, however, important in helping your body fight infections, so you probably need to be a bit more careful about preventing infections going forward.

Also, everything I've just described is just a layman's perspective. I'm not a doctor, so you should discuss these issues with your doctor at one of your next appointments.

I hope this helps. Let us know if you have any additional questions.

TerryH

Re: MGUS since 2012 - understanding my lab results

by Toni on Sun Mar 08, 2015 6:49 pm

I am also a "layperson," and I'm not too academic either, so it's taken me almost a full year to even understand any of this :-)

However, your situation is very similar to mine. So I wanted to give you some perspective.

  • I have IgG kappa MGUS (M-spike usually 1.0 g/dL)
     
  • Up until my last testing in October, I had 3 tests which showed immunoparesis of the IgM. Why it is normal now, I do not know, but I've also noticed I barely got sick this past win­ter ... yay!
     
  • Kappa / lambda ratio is high (4.14).
So I asked my myeloma specialist hematologist-oncologist about the K/L ratio, since I was con­cerned about the risk factor and to me this seemed very high if you look at it compared to other tests which are flagged as high.

He told me that really what they concerned with is if one of those indicators become exceptionally high. So, for example, if either kappa or lambda alone tested at 100, then they would be con­cerned. In browsing through many posts on the Myeloma Beacon, it is clear that those who have a significantly high k/l ratio also present with other abnormal results.

Your M-spike has been wonderfully stable this whole time. I would take great consolation in that! :)

Toni
Name: Toni
Who do you know with myeloma?: self - MGUS
When were you/they diagnosed?: April 2014
Age at diagnosis: 51

Re: MGUS since 2012 - understanding my lab results

by Egran on Sun Mar 08, 2015 7:29 pm

TerryH and Toni,

Thank you so much for all the info and help­ing me understand all of this a little better.

Although my IGM is lowering with every test I take, I have only been sick with one cold since hav­ing mono in 2012.

Egran


Return to MGUS