I will definitely hold off on deciding anything until I see what the status is post-transplant. My oncologists seem to in the 'continuous maintenance for life' camp, and they usually like to start it 3 months post-transplant. Three months doesn't seem like enough time to know the results of transplant or for recovery from transplant (?). Sorry, but 'continuous maintenance for life' just doesn't sound good to me!
My oncologist told me today that they don't generally test for 'MRD' status, since it doesn't change their treatment recommendations. I guess they recommend maintenance to everyone regardless of your status. But this article contradicts that:
"One of the things we’re looking at is minimal residual disease. Patients who could be shown by special tests to have no minimal residual disease at a deep molecular level, signifying deep remission, might not need maintenance therapy. I think incorporating such a test is the next major step."
So I'll be requesting the tests required re: my 'MRD' status, assuming that blood work does not definitively show I clearly have 'residual disease'. I see from this thread that the topic of MRD testing is also somewhat complicated.
"Minimal residual disease (MRD) testing - some questions" (started March 28, 2014)
Sigh. What a bloody complicated disease we have. Each question seems to lead to a more equally complicated question!
Good to hear that the side effects are greatly less on maintenance. I have a lot of concerns about the relentless GI issues from these drugs. My guts seriously need a break. Hope the break from Revlimid I will get in 2 weeks helps somewhat. Of course, from what I've been reading, even greater gut hell awaits me in transplant recovery. Guess I'll lose that 15 pounds I've been wanting to lose.

RT