The Myeloma Beacon

Independent, up-to-date news and information for the multiple myeloma community.
Home page Deutsche Artikel Artículos Españoles

Forums

General questions and discussion about multiple myeloma (i.e., symptoms, lab results, news, etc.) If unsure where to post, use this discussion area.

Re: ASH 2010 Multiple Myeloma Discussion - Day 1

by Julie Shilane on Sun Dec 05, 2010 1:21 am

There were a number of exciting posters at this evening's poster session.

There were 4 posters about carfilzomib (the next generation proteasome inhibitor):

  • Phase 2 study of carfilzomib in Velcade-naive patients showing about a 50% response rate and minimal neuropathy
  • Phase 2b study showing that cytogenetics do not affect patient response to carfilzomib (in fact the response rate for patients with one or more abnormalities was greater than the response rate for patients with no abnormalities)
  • Long-term results showing that carfilzomib is well-tolerated during extended treatment (60% of patients are still being treated, and 30% have been treated for more than 1.5 years)
  • A safety analysis of four Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials showed that carfilzomib was well-tolerated with very low rates of severe side effects. The most common severe side effect was pneumonia (3.5%). Very few patients experienced peripheral neuropathy (4% overall and 0.4% severe neuropathy)
There were three posters about Zolinza (vorinostat), a histone deacetylase inhibitor:

  • Phase 1 study of Zolinza in combination with Revlimid and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory patients showed that 52% of patients responded with a median time to progression of 5 months. The most common severe side effects were low blood cell counts, diarrhea, and fatigue.
  • Phase 1 study of Zolinza in combination with Velcade and Doxil in relapsed/refractory patients showed an overall response rate of 72%, and a response rate of 44% in Velcade refractory patients. Low platelet counts were the most common side effect.
  • Two Phase 3 studies are evaluating the efficacy of Zolinza in combination with Velcade in relapsed/refractory myeloma patients. Both trials are still recruiting patients. Interim results from one of the studies suggest that the combination may have activity in patients who are refractory to Velcade and Revlimid/thalidomide.
There was one poster about pomalidomide, but rather than looking at how patients responded to pomalidomide, it looked at how patients who had already relapsed after pomalidomide responded to salvage therapy afterward.

There was one Phase 1 trial investigating elotuzumab, a monoclonal antibody. It was being tested in combination with Revlimid and low-dose dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory patients. An objective response (partial response or better) was seen in 82% of patients who had previously been treated with Revlimid and 96% of patients who were Revlimid-naive. Treatment took about 7 weeks before patients responded, and the median time to progression has not yet been reached. The most common severe side effects were low white blood cell and platelet counts.

There were also two posters about lorvotuzumab mertansine (IMGN901), a drug that kills cancer cells bound to an antibody that directs the drug right to the cancer cell:

  • Phase 1 study of lorvutuzumab mertansine in heavily pre-treated myeloma patients to determine the maximum tolerated dose and activity of the drug. Preliminary results show 18% of patients achieved an objective response. About half of the patients remained on treatment for at least 3 months, and 7% have been on therapy for more than a year. A few patients have experienced severe fatigue, kidney failure, weekness, or muscle issues.
  • Phase 1 study of lorvutuzumab mertansine in combination with Revlimid and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory patients to determine the maximum tolerated dose. The study is still recruiting patients. Early results showed that at the lowest dose to be tested, two out of three patients achieved a partial response and remain on treatment.

Julie Shilane
Name: Julie Shilane, Beacon Staff

Re: ASH 2010 Multiple Myeloma Discussion - Day 1

by aliarsan on Sun Dec 05, 2010 1:25 am

In the expert session "Future Therapies for Myeloma" a group of physicians discussed under the leadership of Dr. Donna Weber of The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston what is in the pipeline for myeloma treatment.

We can expect to see more novel agents such as proteasome inhibitors, HDACC inhibitors, pomalidomide, monoclonal antibodies, and new synergistic combinations of existing agents and novel agents that increase efficacy and address resistance issues.

One such new agent, a proteasome inhibitor, is carfilzomib. This new novel agent has done great in initial trials with similar or higher efficacy when compared to bortezomib (Velcade). The most exciting aspect of carfilzomib is that it is much more tolerable long term with significantly less neuropathy in comparison to lenalidomide or bortezomib. Similarly, carfilzomib has shown great promise in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

aliarsan
Name: Ali Arsan

Re: ASH 2010 Multiple Myeloma Discussion - Day 1

by Julie Shilane on Sun Dec 05, 2010 1:38 am

Thanks Ali for summarizing your lunch discussion with Dr. Weber! Since only a small number of people are able to participate in each luncheon, I'm glad you were able to participate so that you could share this interesting information with us!

There seems to be a general consus among the experts about the most promising treatments in the pipeline. I spoke with Dr. Peter Voorhees from UNC Chapel Hill at the poster session. He is a lead author on one of the Zolinza studies. He also said that the most promising treatments are carfilzomib, pomalidomide, HDAC inhibitors (in particular Zolinza and panobinostat), and the monoclonal antibody elotuzumab. I can't remember if he mentioned perifosine, but that's another one that is generally regarded as promising. Likewise, these are all the same drugs that Dr. Lonial mentioned in his talk this morning.

Julie Shilane
Name: Julie Shilane, Beacon Staff

Re: ASH 2010 Multiple Myeloma Discussion - Day 1

by vkiser on Sun Dec 05, 2010 9:58 am

Julie - THANK YOU for taking the time to give us updates on everything! multiple myeloma patients and caregivers everywhere so appreciate this! As someone already said...makes us feel as though we are there! Keep up the good work! =)

vkiser

Re: ASH 2010 Multiple Myeloma Discussion - Day 1

by Julie Shilane on Sun Dec 05, 2010 12:38 pm

There was one poster last night about a myeloma vaccine. The poster presented the 5-year follow-up results of a Phase 2 trial studying a myeloma vaccine. The study was done by the Mayo Clinic.

Twenty patients received an autologous stem cell transplant and then were treated with a vaccine called Mylovenge and cytokine treatment. No life-threatening side effects were observed. Severely low blood counts, infection, and bleeding were reported. Depending on the type of cytokine administered, median time to progression was 6.6 to 9.3 months. After 5 years, about 60 percent of the patients were still alive.

When compared to a similar group of patients who only received an autologous stem cell transplant, time to progress was similar, but overall survival was significantly longer in the vaccine group.

Julie Shilane
Name: Julie Shilane, Beacon Staff

Previous

Return to Multiple Myeloma