Could A Decades-Old Antibiotic Have Anti-Myeloma Activity?
In the midst of the annual late May / early June medical conference season, with the many presentations of results from large-scale clinical trials, it is perhaps refreshing to learn that small-scale research has uncovered a previously unexplored potential myeloma therapy.
In particular, physicians in New Zealand have found signs that roxithromycin, an antibiotic first used more than 30 years ago, may have anti-myeloma activity. The physicians shared their finding in a case report published last month.
In their report, the physicians describe the case of an 86-year-old man who has been under their care. The man was diagnosed in June 2008 with IgA lambda smoldering myeloma. Last August, after just a 10-day course of treatment with the antibiotic roxithromycin, the patient’s M-spike dropped substantially.
Prior to the roxithromycin treatment, which was administered to treat pneumonia, the patient’s M-spike was 4.6 g/dL (46 g/l).
After treatment with roxithromycin, the patient’s M-spike was 2 g/dL (20 g/l), a decrease of 57 percent.
Just as importantly, the reduction in the patient’s M-spike has persisted for the nine months since the roxithromycin treatment, according to data shared with The Myeloma Beacon by Dr. Ian Morison, one of the authors of the case report.
Similarly, the potential anti-myeloma activity of roxithromycin was evidenced not just by its impact on the patient’s M-spike, but also on his hemoglobin level.
Prior to treatment with the antibiotic, the patient’s hemoglobin level was 9.7 g/dL. After treatment, his hemoglobin reached 12.3 g/dL, and the elevation in hemoglobin level has persisted since last August.
Dr. Morison, who is a professor of pathology at the Dunedin School of Medicine in New Zealand, emphasized to The Beacon that the finding he and his colleagues have shared “is a single report of a single patient.” No conclusions should be drawn based on the report, he said, and not just because it concerns a single patient.
Dr. Morison and his colleagues have examined a few other cases of myeloma patients who were treated with roxithromycin, and “there were no other notable responses” to the antibiotic, he told The Beacon. That having been said, Dr. Morison also noted that most of those other patients had previously been treated for their myeloma, making them less likely to respond to any treatment, including roxithromycin.
In addition, there is experience with another antibiotic similar to roxithromycin that suggests the finding the researchers share in their case report may be more than just an isolated anomaly.
Roxithromycin, Clarithromycin, And Other Macrolide Antibiotics
Roxithromycin belongs to the class of antibiotics known as macrolides. Several macrolide antibiotics will be familiar to Beacon readers, including azithromycin (Zithromax) and erythromycin. The macrolide antibiotic of particular interest, however, is clarithromycin (Biaxin).
Clarithromycin has been the subject of a number of myeloma-related research studies since the late 1990s, when a clinical trial found evidence the antibiotic might have anti-myeloma activity. Several studies soon thereafter could not confirm that clarithromycin by itself is active against myeloma. Later studies, however, found that clarithromycin deepens treatment responses when the antibiotic is used in combination with other myeloma therapies.
Many myeloma specialists attribute the deeper responses achieved when clarithromycin is combined with other therapies to be the result of clarithromycin prolonging the activity of the dexamethasone that usually is included in combination regimens. In essence, these specialists view adding clarithromycin to be equivalent to increasing the dose of dexamethasone, a strategy that usually increases treatment response, but does not always increase overall survival.
This is why clarithromycin is not used by many myeloma specialists as part of the treatment regimens they recommend.
There have been, however, a number of specialists who have continued to include clarithromycin in treatment regimens they regularly use, the best known of which goes by the acronym “BiRD,” which stands for Biaxin (clarithromycin), Revlimid (lenalidomide), and dexamethasone.
These clarithromycin proponents believe the antibiotic either has anti-myeloma activity on its own, or that its impact on the activity of combination treatment regimens goes beyond just increasing the impact of the dexamethasone in the regimen.
Could Roxithromycin Be A More Effective Clarithromycin?
The reason all of this is relevant to the New Zealand roxithromycin case report is that roxithromycin not only is a close chemical relative of clarithromycin, but it also is more easily absorbed into the blood than clarithromycin, and it stays in the body about 3 times longer than clarithromycin.
Both of these characteristics would make roxithromycin more effective against myeloma than clarithromycin even if, molecule for molecule, it was no more active against the disease than clarithromycin.
More About Roxithromycin And The Case Report
Roxithromycin is not approved for sale in either the United States or Canada, but it does have marketing authorization in most European countries and many countries throughout the rest of the world, including Japan, Korea, Australia, New Zealand, India, Israel, and South Africa.
Information about roxithromycin intended for patients and caregivers, and which is approved by New Zealand regulatory authorities, can be found in this “consumer medicine information” leaflet. The New Zealand prescribing information for roxithromycin is available here.
Dr. Morison and his colleagues are considering organizing a clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of roxithromycin as a myeloma therapy. To get approval for such a trial, it would be helpful to have information about additional cases where myeloma appears to have responded to treatment with roxithromycin. If you are aware of such a case, please consider sharing information about it with Dr. Morison. He can be reached via email at ian.morison@otago.ac.nz.
For additional information about the response to roxithromycin reported by the New Zealand physicians, see their case report, Chai, AY, et al., “Roxithromycin monotherapy inducing a partial response in a patient with myeloma: a case report,” Journal of Medical Case Reports, May 10, 2018 (full text of article).
Related Articles:
- None Found


This sounds interesting, and the fact that another antibiotic in the same class (macrolides), clarithromycin, is already used for some myeloma patients makes it more so. I suppose an early trial would be 'in vitro' where myeloma cell lines could be tested as to viability when given the antibiotics individually, and without dex. There may already be some studies available concerning Biaxin.
I checked to see what antibiotic I had been given for a year after my stem cell transplant, but it was Septra (trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole), which is not in the same category of antibiotics. The antibiotic was given since I had low immunities at that time.