Home » News

Carfilzomib To Face Critical FDA Advisory Committee Meeting Next Week

14 Comments By
Published: Jun 15, 2012 2:16 pm

Carfilzomib has an important date next week.

An advisory committee to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will meet next Wednesday to review data about car­filz­o­mib's efficacy and safety.  The review will focus, in particular, on clinical trial results for carfilzomib (Kyprolis) as a treat­ment for re­lapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients.

At the end of the meeting, the committee will vote whether or not to recommend that the FDA approve car­filz­o­mib as a new myeloma treat­ment.

A Beacon survey of financial analysts who follow the stock of Onyx Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:ONXX), the com­pany developing car­filz­o­mib, suggests the vote will be a nail biter.  A majority of analysts expect the committee to vote in favor of approval, but even those expecting a favorable vote think it will be close.

The FDA is not legally bound to follow its advisory committees’ recommendations regarding new drug applications, but it usually does.

Onyx Pharmaceuticals completed its application to the FDA last September to have car­filz­o­mib approved for the treat­ment of re­lapsed and refractory (resistant) multiple myeloma patients who have had at least two prior ther­a­pies (see related Beacon news).

The FDA is required to make a decision about car­filz­o­mib’s application by July 27.

To assist it with its decision, the FDA has scheduled next week's meeting of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC).  The ODAC is the advisory committee that advises the FDA regarding cancer drugs.

The rest of this article addresses key questions regarding the upcoming ODAC meeting and the FDA's review of car­filz­o­mib's new drug application.

Is The ODAC Likely To Vote In Favor Of Carfilzomib?

Prior to each ODAC meeting, the FDA staff prepares and then distributes to the committee members a report reviewing data on the benefits and risks of the drug the committee will be reviewing during its meeting.

Accompanying the report is a question that the staff would like the ODAC to consider.  The question typically asks whether the data for the drug dem­onstrate a favorable risk/benefit profile.

At the conclusion of the ODAC meeting, the advisory committee votes on the FDA staff's question, essentially recommending whether or not the FDA should approve the drug.

The Beacon polled financial analysts who cover Onyx to see what they thought would be the out­come of the advisory committee vote.  Among the eight analysts who responded to the survey, 62 per­cent said they expect the ODAC to vote in favor of the FDA approving car­filz­o­mib.

Specifically, five of the respondents felt that a weak majority of the committee members would vote in favor of car­filz­o­mib being approved.  Two felt that a weak majority of the committee members would be opposed to approving car­filz­o­mib, and one felt that a strong majority would be opposed.  No analysts indicated that they thought a strong majority of the committee would be in favor of approval.

These expectations are more optimistic about car­filz­o­mib's chances at next week's committee meeting than pre­vi­ous reports of investor or analyst sentiment.  A June 4 ISI Group survey of more than 100 major Wall Street investors, for example, found that 72 per­cent expect car­filz­o­mib to get a negative vote at the end of next week's committee meeting.

What Is The ODAC And What Is Its Purpose?

The Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee reviews and evaluates safety and efficacy data for marketed as well as potential new cancer drugs.  The committee then advises the FDA whether to approve the new cancer drug or to modify the approved uses of a cur­rently marketed drug.

The FDA is not legally required to follow a vote of its advisory committees.  The agency also considers the comments made during the meeting.  On occasion, the FDA decides against the advisory committee’s recommendation.

The ODAC typically is made up of 13 voting members who are experts in a variety of types of cancers as well as biostatistics and related fields.  One of these voting members can be someone selected to represent consumer interests.  The committee also can have one non-voting member appointed to represent the pharma­ceu­tical industry.

What Does The ODAC Typically Base Its Recommendation On?

Prior to the advisory committee meeting, the staff of the FDA prepares briefing in­­for­ma­tion for the advisory committee members.  Besides providing back­ground in­­for­ma­tion about the relevant disease, the document states the intended use of the drug, summarizes the efficacy and safety data, and describes any issues the FDA staff may have with the submission.

The briefing in­­for­ma­tion along with the wording of the question the FDA asks the advisory committee to vote on are important.  They provide insight into which way the FDA is leaning in regard to whether or not to approve a new drug or expand the approved use of an already marketed drug.

During an advisory committee meeting to review a new drug, the com­pany developing the drug gives several presentations.  The presentations typically explain why the drug addresses an important unmet treat­ment need, summarize pre-clinical and clinical trial results for the drug, and describe any future clinical trials that may be planned.

The FDA staff also make a presentation stating which agency employees are responsible for reviewing the drug application and what require­ments the application must meet in order to be approved.  The FDA presentation also summarizes the clinical trial results for the drug and describes any future clinical trials that are planned.  The presentation concludes with the issues the agency would like the advisory committee to discuss.

There is also a session during the meeting in which the public can address the advisory committee.  This is a time when patients, advocacy organizations, or others with an interest in whether the drug gets approved can present their comments.

What Data Will Be Presented And Discussed At Carfilzomib's ODAC Meeting?

In the case of car­filz­o­mib, the data reviewed during the ODAC meeting will be results of the drug's Phase 2 "003-A1" trial of single-agent car­filz­o­mib in re­lapsed/refractory myeloma patients.  These are the results Onyx has submitted to the FDA for review along with its application for car­filz­o­mib's approval.

Results from other clinical trials -- such as those involving car­filz­o­mib in com­bi­na­tion with Revlimid (lena­lido­mide) and dexamethasone (Decadron) in newly diagnosed patients -- will most likely not be discussed, since results from those trials were not part of the application Onyx submitted to the FDA.

Furthermore, a key issue during the meeting will be whether the results of the single-arm Phase 2 003-A1 trial are sufficient for the FDA to approve car­filz­o­mib.

Onyx applied to the FDA for approval of car­filz­o­mib under the so-called "accelerated approval" process.   That process permits the FDA to approve a new drug for a serious disease even if the clinical trial data for the drug are not particularly extensive.

However, by law, the FDA can only approve drugs under the accelerated approval process if the clinical trial results submitted with the new drug application are “adequate and well controlled.”  Analysts who are pessimistic about car­filz­o­mib's chances at next week's meeting believe the committee may not view the drug's Phase 2 trial data as meeting this standard.

What Does The Outcome Of The ODAC Meeting Mean?

While it is finalizing its decision in regard to car­filz­o­mib's new drug application, the FDA will consider the ODAC’s vote and other comments made during the committee's meeting.  The agency will then make its decision about the car­filz­o­mib application.

Regulatory rules require that the FDA make its decision by July 27.  The agency has the option, however, of extending this deadline if it feels it needs extra time to review car­filz­o­mib's efficacy or safety data.

There are three potential decisions that the FDA could announce when it finally concludes its review of the car­filz­o­mib new drug application.  It can approve the application, it can issue what is known as a "complete response letter," or it can turn down the application.

If the FDA feels that the clinical trial results for car­filz­o­mib sufficiently dem­onstrate a positive benefit/risk ratio for the drug's intended patient population, it will approve the drug.  That will mean that Onyx can begin marketing the drug within the United States.

If there are problems with the application, or if the FDA feels more in­­for­ma­tion is needed to decide on the application, it will issue a so-called ‘complete response letter’ to Onyx.

The complete response letter can be issued because of safety issues, failure to dem­onstrate a drug's efficacy, or manu­fac­tur­ing issues. The FDA may, for example, require Onyx to conduct addi­tional clinical studies to address the agency’s concerns. The FDA will explain its decision in the complete response letter and will give Onyx the opportunity to discuss any deficiencies in a hearing with the agency.

Onyx could then ask for a hearing, correct any deficiencies, and submit new in­­for­ma­tion, or it could withdraw car­filz­o­mib's new drug application.

A complete response letter from the FDA would, however, delay the launch of car­filz­o­mib until Onyx is able to address any questions or concerns raised by the FDA.

If the FDA comes to the conclusion that car­filz­o­mib’s risks noticeably outweigh its benefits, it will turn down the application. In that case, Onyx would have to submit a completely new drug application to be considered for approval again.

The Myeloma Beacon will con­tinue to cover the events leading up to Wednesday’s ODAC meeting and the FDA’s decision regarding the car­filz­o­mib application.

Until car­filz­o­mib receives FDA approval, the drug is available through Onyx’s expanded access pro­gram for re­lapsed and refractory myeloma patients in the U.S. who do not have any other treat­ment options.

Carfilzomib works similarly to the existing multiple myeloma treat­ment Velcade (bor­tez­o­mib).  Both drugs are in the class of drugs known as proteasome inhibitors.  They work by preventing the breakdown of protein in cancer cells, triggering their death.

Carfilzomib and pomalidomide – a chemical relative of multiple myeloma drugs Revlimid (lena­lido­mide) and thalidomide (Thalomid) – are the only drugs cur­rently under review by the FDA for potential approval as new treat­ments for myeloma.

Tags: , , , ,


Related Articles:

14 Comments »

  • Gary said:

    Beacon Staff: Have you surveyed your MM patient readership on their experiences with Carfilsomib? Naturally, this has no impact on the decision makers but would be of interest to us. I must admit my personal experience with carfilsomib has been bad and I have heard horror stories from others. I have also heard quite promising results from still different patients. I simply wonder how many patients out there are like me.
    If such a survey has not been done you could make it happen before the big day when ONYX is poised to make millions from the government.

  • Boris Simkovich said:

    Thanks for your comment, Gary.

    As you know, we've covered a lot of different topics in our Weekly Polls. However, we've explicitly shied away from asking general, qualitative questions about specific drugs. We're concerned that the results of such poll questions could be, at best, hard to interpret, and, at worst, wrongly interpreted.

    This could be even more the case for carfilzomib, given that only a handful of our regular readers have been treated with it.

    I also would be particularly hesitant to run a poll about reader experiences with carfilzomib right now, when there would be a substantial incentive for people to "game" the poll results.

    Thus, although I appreciate the suggestion and I don't want to discourage you from making additional ones in the future, I think we're going to pass on this one.

    Thanks again ... and have a great weekend!

  • suzierose said:

    Hi beacon staff!

    Is anyone attending ODAC meeting so we can learn the pertinent / pivotal questions they focused on?

    Boris I agree with u about timing of the poll. Prudent not to.

    Also think financial analyst comments are gaming the system as well. The financial folks have no interest in patients health. It is all about their investors getting a return. Anyone who uses verbiage like "weak " majority is simply telling folks how to hedge their bets. If it a health issue then majorioty is all that matter.

    Their views are not worth reporting on when talking about saving peoples lives or making them livability. Since their sole interest is $$$$$$$$ who gets it % how to place your bet to get the most with lease monetary risk.

    I would like to have seen a list instead of the ODAC members their specific oncology backgrounds, who they receive honorariums from and their tenure on panel far moreso than what financial analysts are gonna gamble on

    Unless u know of insiders trading on ODAC ..:)

  • Chris said:

    Hi Beacon Staff,

    Does anyone know how the FDA's decision will impact patients who are currently in Carfilzomib clinical trials?

    1)If it's approved, can Drs only use it for relapsed/refractory patients? What about newly diagnosed MM?
    2)If it's denied

    My husband has been in a Carfilzomib trial for newly diagnosed MM for a year now and we sure hope it gets approved. He currently must drive 3 1/2 hrs one way to get to the Univ of Mich for his treatments. It would really be nice for him to get it from the local oncologist and for everyone else to have it as a treatment option.

    Thanks,
    Chris

  • suzierose said:

    Hi Chris,

    Yes.
    Until the drug is FDA approved physicians cannot write prescriptions for it. Access to carfilzomib will be limited to clinical trials and compassion use via Onyx the manufacturer.

  • Myeloma Beacon Staff said:

    Hi suzierose and Chris,

    As you might expect, we will have very detailed coverage of everything related to the ODAC meeting next week. When the question for the committee becomes available as well as the final list of ODAC committee members (it varies a bit from meeting to meeting), we will provide an update with that information.

    If carfilzomib is approved by the FDA this year, it will be officially approved for use in relapsed/refractory patients with at least two prior therapies. However, given the rules in the U.S. related to so-called "off label" prescribing, physicians actually will have quite a bit of flexibility in regard to the patients they can choose to treat with the drug.

    As for the extensive number of ongoing carfilzomib clinical trials as well as the carfilzomib expanded access program currently sponsored by Onyx, there has not been any indication thus far that they would be affected one way or another by the FDA decision regarding carfilzomib's new drug application. Past experience would suggest that those trials and the expanded access program would continue regardless of whether carfilzomib is approved or not.

    Regarding the value of financial analyst predictions on these matters ... Financial markets can make money off moves in a stock's price whether it goes up, down, or stays the same. There is no natural bias in the markets to be for against a stock. In addition, many financial analysts make money primarily off the value of their advice, not investments by their firm that might be influenced by their advice.

    Thus, in the end, a key way to make money in financial markets -- or giving financial market advice -- is by being the best at predicting what's going to happen to individual companies or groups of companies.

    We therefore think it's valuable to listen to what financial analysts and investors as a group are saying. It doesn't mean they will always be right. But there is generally value in what they have to say.

    One quick final note ... The Beacon specified the options for how the financial analysts could respond in our survey. So criticism of the survey wording should be directed at us, not the financial analysts who were generous enough to share their opinions with The Beacon and its readers.

    Thanks for your comments and questions!

  • Masood said:

    thanks for the info re: ODAC meeting on wednesday. can someone please tell me the location and time of the meeting? I'll search or call FDA to see if I can find the info. we'll try to attend the meeting. thanks in advance for your response.

    Masood

  • Myeloma Beacon Staff said:

    Hello Masood,

    The meeting will take place at the following location: FDA White Oak Campus, Building 31, The Great Room (Rm. 1503), White Oak Conference Center, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland.

    The entire meeting will run from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m., but the part of the meeting focused on carfilzomib will be in the afternoon, starting around 1:00 p.m.

  • terryl1 said:

    I hope and pray it gets approved as it has worked a miracle for me. I am in Dr. Landgren's carfilzomib trial at the NIH/NCI for newly diagnosed patients. I enrolled after progressing on 5/3/12. I was informed yesterday that after only one cycle I achieved a VGPR with an approximately 93% drop in my serum kappa light chains. I am light chain only so this is how they monitor my disease. Also, amazingly my blood counts are normalizing---WBC is 4.5, last month it was as low as 1.0; neutrophils are 4.0, last month they were only .33 necessitating Neupogen shots and my hemoglobin is now 11.5, last month 8.7. I feel 100% better and there is no doublt carfilzomib works super fast with minimal side effects. I hope the FDA reviews the NIH trial. If they do, I believe they will be very impressed by the results. Terry L.

  • Mrs. Wood said:

    terryl1,
    Tthat is wonderful news, my husband starts on the same trial on Tuesday. Your numbers have really turned around. I have been nothing but pleased with NIH. All the best to you and the others on this trial.

  • Terryl1 said:

    Thanks, Mrs. Woods! The NIH team is awesome and Dr. Landgren is a wonderful physician and human being. Good luck to your husband and I pray for good and quick results for him. Big hugs, Terry L

  • nancy shamanna said:

    I think that most of us who have suffered through or who are now being treated for myeloma are hoping that the new drug carfilzomib is approved for use next week! Glad to hear you are doing so well, Terry! What a relief for you too!

  • Terryl1 said:

    Thanks, Nancy! What a rollercoaster ride it's been. Waiting for lab results for all of us is such a stressful purgatory to be in----good to hear good results!

  • Sandy said:

    Is the ODAC meeting Tomorrow, June 20th? And is it open up to the public? I would like to attend, if possible.
    Thank you!