Revlimid-Velcade-Doxil-Dexamethasone Combination May Be Effective And Tolerable In Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma

Results of a small Phase 2 study show that the four-drug combination therapy of Revlimid, Velcade, Doxil, and dexamethasone may be an effective and tolerable treatment option for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients.
According to the study investigators, the four-drug regimen compares favorably to the three-drug combination without Revlimid in that it improves response rates without a significant increase in side effects.
The investigators recommend that future trials further investigate the number and specific types of previous treatments to identify those in which the Revlimid, Velcade, Doxil, and dexamethasone combination may work best as subsequent treatment.
In recent years, the use of novel agents such as Velcade (bortezomib) and Revlimid (lenalidomide) has become the standard of care for multiple myeloma patients. Combination regimens containing these agents have led to greater response rates than any anti-myeloma drug alone.
Doxil (doxorubicin liposomal) is an anticancer agent marketed by the Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) subsidiary Janssen Biotech. It kills myeloma cells by damaging their DNA.
Doxil has the same active ingredient as the chemotherapy agent doxorubicin (Adriamycin), but in Doxil the active ingredient is coated so that it stays in the body longer. Doxil has been in short supply during the past year due to manufacturing problems. To alleviate this shortage, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration last month decided to allow the temporary importation of Lipodox, a version of Doxil marketed by Sun Pharma.
Doxil has demonstrated promising anti-myeloma activity in relapsed or refractory patients when administered in combination with Velcade and dexamethasone (Decadron) (see related Beacon news). To further improve the efficacy of this regimen, clinical studies are being conducted to assess the addition of a fourth drug.
In an earlier Phase 1/2 trial evaluating the addition of Revlimid to Velcade, Doxil, and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed myeloma patients, the four-drug regimen, sometimes referred to as RVDD or DVD-R, led to a high response rate (96 percent) but poor tolerability. More recent studies have modified the dosing and scheduling of drug administration in this combination with the hope of maintaining efficacy while reducing the side effects.
The results indicated that lower doses of Velcade in addition to lower doses and more frequent administration of Doxil during a longer treatment cycle led to comparable response rates while improving tolerability.
Based on these findings, researchers led by Dr. James Berenson at the Institute for Myeloma and Bone Cancer Research sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this modified four-drug regimen in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients.
A total of 40 relapsed and/or refractory myeloma patients with a median age of 70 years were enrolled in the trial. The patients had received a median of three prior lines of therapy, including 43 percent who had received a Velcade, Doxil, and dexamethasone combination and 25 percent who had prior treatment with Revlimid, Velcade, Doxil, and dexamethasone.
The patients received up to eight 28-day cycles of 4 mg/m2 of Doxil, 1 mg/m2 of Velcade, and 40 mg of dexamethasone on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 plus 10 mg of Revlimid on days 1 through 14.
The median follow-up time was 11 months.
Overall, 49 percent of the study participants responded to the four-drug combination: 21 percent of patients achieved a complete response, 10 percent a very good partial response, and 18 percent a partial response. An additional 36 percent of patients achieved a minimal response.
By comparison, results of a previous trial had shown that among relapsed and refractory patients who received a similar treatment schedule with Velcade, Doxil, and dexamethasone, 4 percent achieved a complete response, 11 percent a very good partial response, 29 percent a partial response, and 18 percent a minimal response.
The researchers noted that for the current study, 77 percent of patients who had progressed on a prior regimen of Velcade, Doxil, and dexamethasone achieved at least a minimal response with the four-drug combination. Furthermore, of the patients who were previously treated with this four-drug regimen, 60 percent achieved at least a minimal response after receiving this combination with a modified dose and schedule of drug administration.
The median time to the best response was two months, and the median duration of response was 12 months.
The median progression-free survival time was nine months, and median overall survival time has not been reached yet.
The most commonly observed side effects included fatigue (40 percent), low platelet counts (35 percent), low white blood cell counts (35 percent), anemia (30 percent), nerve damage in the extremities, also called peripheral neuropathy, (25 percent), and pneumonia (15 percent).
For more information, please see the study in the journal Leukemia (abstract).
Related Articles:
- Nelfinavir-Velcade Combination Very Active In Advanced, Velcade-Resistant Multiple Myeloma
- Nelfinavir Shows Only Limited Success In Overcoming Revlimid Resistance In Multiple Myeloma Patients
- Revlimid, Velcade, and Dexamethasone, Followed By Stem Cell Transplantation, Yields Deep Responses And Considerable Overall Survival In Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
- Adding Clarithromycin To Velcade-Based Myeloma Treatment Regimen Fails To Increase Efficacy While Markedly Increasing Side Effects
- Eyelid-Related Complications Of Velcade Therapy: New Insights And Recommendations
Hi Virginia: This is good stuff and exciting to see the degree of response in heavily pretreated MM patients. The question I have is now what? We have shown that changing the dosage regimen (lower levels and longer times) have reduced the side effects without radically compromising the efficacy. Why not decrease them further? Is Dr. Berenson planning a research trial that would individualize the dosing for the patients (getting the optimal four dose treatment levels)?. It seems that the reported study is but a first step in elucidating the best four compound dosing combination. (We stopped when we decreased Velcade from twice a week to once a week and we stopped after finding "low dose" dex instead of finding whether there was a "lower dose" of dex ) Let's not stop again. Let's find the lowest dose which maximizes the efficacy for each patient with minimal side effects. It can be done.
"Overall, 49 percent of the study participants responded to the four-drug combination: 21 percent of patients achieved a complete response, 10 percent a very good partial response, and 18 percent a partial response. An additional 36 percent of patients achieved a minimal response."
These are not compelling numbers, at all, relative to the toxicities and decreased QOL.
I'm not sure that's a fair assessment. The key thing is the patient population:
"A total of 40 relapsed and/or refractory myeloma patients with a median age of 70 years were enrolled in the trial. The patients had received a median of three prior lines of therapy, including 43 percent who had received a Velcade, Doxil, and dexamethasone combination and 25 percent who had prior treatment with Revlimid, Velcade, Doxil, and dexamethasone."
In other words, this isn't a patient population that is easy to treat -- particularly with this drug regimen. The patients already have had a median of three previous lines of therapy. Plus, over 40 percent already had received the VDD part of the RVDD regimen tested in the trial, and one out of four had been treated previously with the same RVDD regimen tested in the trial (but, I assume, with a different dosing schedule).
I agree Ricardo, the patient population is why it is not compelling.
If the patient population is so diverse that getting the dose right is unimportant than why publish the results in the first place?
We have to start somewhere in getting the dosing problem straightened out. Ideally we would start with newly diagnosed patients but this doesn't seem to be happening. Like everything else in MM we start with heavily pretreated patients which have a large interpatient variabiity in response to the drugs. This is an ideal cohort to use for personalized medicine. Surely improving the response and quality of life is compelling to these "salvage" patients. I suspect I will be one soon enough.
Progress toward fundraising goal
for all of 2020:
15%
For more information, see the Beacon's
"2020 Fundraising: Goals And Updates" page