Velcade-Based Therapy May Improve Survival Of Multiple Myeloma Patients With Deletion In Chromosome 17

Results from a recent German analysis suggest that Velcade-based treatment both before and after stem cell transplantation leads to better survival outcomes than treatment without Velcade in multiple myeloma patients with a deletion in chromosome 17.
The German analysis used data from a Phase 3 clinical trial in which some patients with chromosomal abnormalities were treated with Velcade (bortezomib)-based therapy, while others were not.
For all types of chromosomal abnormalities, survival was similar or better for patients in the trial who received Velcade-based therapy.
In particular, though, patients with a deletion in chromosome 17 had significantly better survival when treated with Velcade.
Based on their results, the study authors recommend that patients with a deletion in chromosome 17 be treated long-term with Velcade.
Chromosomal abnormalities result from changes in the structure or number of an individual’s chromosomes. These changes may occur through deletions, insertions, duplications, or movement of chromosomal regions.
Previous research has shown that certain chromosomal abnormalities, such as the translocations t(4;14) and t(14;16) and deletions in chromosomes 13 and 17, are considered high-risk factors in multiple myeloma patients because these patients tend to have poorer prognoses.
Previous studies have indicated that Velcade-based therapies may improve the outcomes of patients with high-risk chromosomal abnormalities (see Beacon related news). However, further research is needed to clarify whether these results apply to all types of high-risk chromosomal abnormalities and which Velcade-based regimens are best.
To further investigate the effect of Velcade in patients with high-risk chromosomal abnormalities, researchers in Germany retrospectively analyzed data from 354 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients who had participated in a Phase 3 trial at German institutions.
The median age of the participants was 57 years, and 97 percent of the patients had high-risk chromosomal abnormalities. The most common chromosomal abnormalities among the patients were gains in chromosome 9 (57 percent), chromosome 15 (52 percent), chromosome 19 (52 percent), and chromosome 11 (49 percent); deletions in chromosome 13 (48 percent); and extra copies of chromosomes (49 percent).
Additional gains, deletions, and translocations also were observed. In particular, 11 percent of participants had deletions in chromosome 17.
Patients were enrolled in the trial between 2005 and 2008.
During the trial, half of the participants were placed in a control group. Patients in this group received three cycles of vincristine, doxorubicin (Adriamycin), and dexamethasone (Decadron) followed by stem cell transplantation. After stem cell transplantation, patients in this group received maintenance therapy with thalidomide (Thalomid) for two years.
The other half of the patients in the trial were placed in a Velcade-treatment group. These patients received Velcade, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone followed by stem cell transplantation and Velcade as maintenance therapy for two years. The dosing of the Velcade maintenance regimen was 1.3 mg/m2 once every two weeks.
The median follow-up time was 41 months.
Among all of the participants, the median progression-free survival time was 33.4 months and the median overall survival had not yet been reached.
The researchers found that deletions in chromosomes 13 and 17, the translocation t(4;14), and a gain in chromosome 1 had a negative impact on both progression-free and overall survival.
Of all analyzed chromosomal abnormalities, deletions in chromosome 17 had the biggest effect on outcome. Patients without the deletion had a median progression-free survival of 36 months, compared to 18 months for patients with the deletion. The researchers observed similar results for the three-year overall survival rates (83 percent for patients without the deletion, compared to 36 percent for patients with the deletion).
Across all of the participants in the study, those who received Velcade-based therapy had longer progression-free survival times (36 versus 31 months) and higher three-year overall survival rates (84 percent versus 73 percent) than patients in the control group.
However, patients with a deletion in chromosome 17 benefited the most from Velcade-based treatment.
Specifically, patients with a deletion in chromosome 17 who received Velcade-based treatment demonstrated a significantly better progression-free survival time (26 months) than those in the control group (12 months). The three-year overall survival rate was also significantly higher in patients who received Velcade (69 percent) than in those in the control group (17 percent).
A previous study showed that Velcade only prior to stem cell transplantation was not superior to standard therapy for patients with a deletion in chromosome 17.
The researchers therefore suggested that the long-term use of Velcade could significantly reduce the negative effects of this chromosomal abnormality on progression-free and overall survival.
However, the study authors pointed out that thalidomide as maintenance therapy is associated with worse overall survival outcomes in patients with high-risk chromosomal abnormalities. As a result, the positive effect of Velcade maintenance therapy may be overstated in these results. They therefore recommended further studies to confirm their findings.
For additional information, please see the study in the journal Blood (abstract).
Related Articles:
- Nelfinavir-Velcade Combination Very Active In Advanced, Velcade-Resistant Multiple Myeloma
- Revlimid, Velcade, and Dexamethasone, Followed By Stem Cell Transplantation, Yields Deep Responses And Considerable Overall Survival In Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
- Adding Clarithromycin To Velcade-Based Myeloma Treatment Regimen Fails To Increase Efficacy While Markedly Increasing Side Effects
- Eyelid-Related Complications Of Velcade Therapy: New Insights And Recommendations
- Importance Of Factors Affecting Multiple Myeloma Survival Changes With Patient Age
Hello, I am researching high-risk MM. My best friend was just diagnosed with a 17p deletion. The articles I have read indicate a survival time as low as 4 months and the highest I saw was 50+ months. What is your average prognosis of survival time with this particular deletion. Thank you.
Hi Sherry,
my dad also has del 17. The prognosis we were given was 2-3 years average (50% live longer, 50% less). I also have been researching this population since it is not very common.
I know it is hard but try not to get caught up in the numbers. There is a lot going on in the MM world right now and a lot of new medications in the works. Also, there are so few people with del 17 that it is hard to find data that shows what is happening with the newer medications, like Velcade. This Velcade article is particularly encouraging because it is one of the first I have seen that shows something is working with del17 folks.
Another interesting development that I just learned about is there is some data that suggests the percentage of abnormal cells may also play a part in prognosis/risk.
For my dad, he has less than 10% abnormal cells and that may indicate that he will respond more like a person in a standard risk category.
So far he is doing great.
hope that helps
This study seems to say conflicting things...first they write:
"Among all of the participants, the median progression-free survival time was 33.4 months and the median...snip...
The researchers found that deletions in chromosomes 13 and 17, the translocation t(4;14), and a gain in chromosome 1 had a negative impact on both progression-free and overall survival."
then they state:
"However, patients with a deletion in chromosome 17 benefited the most from Velcade-based treatment.
Specifically, patients with a deletion in chromosome 17 who received Velcade-based treatment demonstrated a significantly better progression-free survival time (26 months) than those in the control group (12 months). The three-year overall survival rate was also significantly higher in patients who received Velcade (69 percent) than in those in the control group (17 percent)."
How does that happen? How can chromosome 17 have most negative impact on PFS and at the same time exhibit the most 'significant gains for PFS vs. the control, AND demonstrate a significantly higher 3 year overall survival rate due to Velcade?
Or, if we use ladder analogy, are they saying that the 17 (TP53) deletion patients started on rung 2 of the ladder while the others, without that chromosome were at rung 5...and that those at rung 5 only went up 2 rungs with Velcade and those at rung 2 went up 4 rungs? So that in the end, those without 17p deletion were at rung 7..and those with it were at rung 6?
But if that is the case how is that 'longer progession free survival' since the folks that started at rung 2 are still behind those who started at rung5? I mean weren't those at rung 5 already going to have long PFS, in other words they had fewer rungs to climb anyway? Just sounds deceptive the way this is being touted.
Now, if we skip the analogy..does this study simply boil down to that Velcade based therapy is better than the VAD therapy? Which has been welll established news?..and/or that this simply a case of a headline conveying a different message than the retrospective study?
Or a manufacturer trying to promote long term use of Velcade by teasing out a niche/wedge of retrospective data, that is primarily due to overall efficacy of a therapeutic regimen vs the specificity of it being "new&improved" better for chromosome 17 patients in order to expand usage?
In short, we already know bortezomib based therapy is better than VAD so what is the news here? That it works better in the overall MM population including chromosome 17, well like duh? It's more effective so why wouldn't that be the case in the overall MM population, as chromosome 17 is just a subset of the overall efficacy, which has been clearly demonstrated with bortezomib vs. VAD. Bortezomib is also a lot less toxic, which means better PFS, in and of itself.
IOW's the rising tide of bortezomib lifted all boats, long ago, so what's new?
Lastly, they write:
"Based on their results, the study authors recommend that patients with a deletion in chromosome 17 be treated long-term with Velcade."
What does long-term mean here? ...hmmmmm...I smell more sales.