Home » News

Czech Researchers Look At Impact Of Chromosomal Abnormalities In Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

3 Comments By
Published: Dec 2, 2011 11:57 am

Myeloma specialists from the Czech Republic have published clinical trial results that shed further light on chromosomal abnormalities and their impact on survival in newly diag­nosed multiple myeloma patients.

Specifically, the researchers found that patients with three or more chromos­omal abnor­malities, a gain in the 1q21 region, or the trans­location t(4;14) have reduced survival compared to patients without such abnormalities.

According to the researchers, their findings highlight the importance of chromosomal abnormalities when considering treatment options for myeloma patients.

They note, however, that their findings need to be confirmed in a pro­spective, randomized trial that includes one or more novel agents.

Chromosomal abnormalities are the result of structural changes in the chromosomes of a patient's myeloma cells.

These changes may occur through deletions, insertions, duplications, or movement of chromosomal regions. Cells with three or more abnormalities in their chromosomes are considered to have a complex karyotype.

Chromosomal abnormalities have been an area of intensive research.  Some abnormalities can be a sign that a patient's myeloma may be less responsive to certain treatments (see related Beacon articles).

To determine the frequency of the most common chromosomal abnormalities and their effect on treatment outcomes in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients, the Czech researchers retrospectively analyzed data from patients who had participated in the Phase 3 CMG2002 trial.

The CMG2002 trial enrolled 542 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients in the Czech Republic from 2002 to 2007.

All patients in the trial received induction therapy with vincristine (Oncovin), doxorubicin (Adriamycin), and dexamethasone (Decadron) followed by high-dose melphalan (Alkeran) and an autologous stem cell transplant.

Patients were then randomized to receive either consolidation therapy and (eventually) maintenance therapy, or maintenance therapy alone.

In the "consolidation plus maintenance therapy" arm of the trial, patients received consolidation therapy consisting of cyclophosphamideetoposide, and dexamethasone administered for four days in months 4, 8, 12, and 16 after the patient's transplant, followed by weekly subcutaneous interferon injections beginning in the 18th month after transplant (until relapse).

In the "maintenance therapy only" arm of the trial, patients received weekly subcutaneous interferon injections after their stem cell transplant and until relapse.

Data on chromosomal abnormalities was available for 207 of the 542 study participants. The median patient age was 57 years.

The most common chromosomal abnormality was the deletion del(13q) (53 percent of patients), followed by a gain in the region 1q21 (46 percent), the translocations t(4;14) (23 percent), and t(11;14) (19 percent).

The least common chromosomal abnormality was the deletion del(17p), which was found in 7 percent of patients. Nineteen percent of patients had a complex karyotype.

Overall, the researchers found no difference in overall response rates in patients with chromosomal abnormalities compared to those without them.

However, the differences in survival for certain chromosomal abnormalities were significant.

The researchers found that patients with complex karyotypes had a significantly shorter time to disesase progression (17.5 months) than those with normal karyotypes (32.1 months).  Similarly, the overall survival for patients with complex karyotypes was 17.5 months, while the median overall survival for patients with normal karyotypes has not been reached.

In patients with t(4;14), researchers found a shorter time to disease progression compared to those without t(4;14) (18.0 months versus 36.2 months, respectively).  Overall survival was also negatively affected by t(4;14), with a median of 33.3 months for patients with the translocation compared to 60.7 months for those without it.

Researchers also found that patients with a gain in the region 1q21 had significantly worse outcomes than those without it.  Patients identified with 1q21 had a median time to disease progression of 21.3 months compared to 32.2 months for those without it.  The median overall survival in the gain of 1q21 subgroup was 30.4 months while it had not yet been reached for those without it.

The researchers pointed out that patients with both t(4;14) and complex karyotypes had very poor prognoses, with an median overall survival of 13.2 months.

The authors of the current study believe their results are a useful addition to the literature on chromosomal abnormalities and their impact on myeloma treatment and prognosis.

The authors accept, however, that some caution should be used in interpreting their results.  None of the patients in the Czech trial were treated with novel myeloma treatments such as thalidomide (Thalomid), Velcade (bortezomib), or Revlimid (lenalidomide).  Yet these drugs are now regularly used in the treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma patients.

For more information, please see the study in the journal Leukemia & Lymphoma (abstract).

Additional Information About Chromosomal Abnormalities

Each person’s genetic material is stored in chromosomes. Humans normally have two copies of 22 different chromosomes as well as two sex chromosomes (XX for women and XY for men).

Every chromosome has two regions, a short region (p) and a long region (q), and specific positions on the chromosome are numbered.

Therefore, 17p13 would refer to position 13 of the short region of chromosome 17.

There are a number of different types of chromosomal abnormalities. The most common chromosomal abnormalities related to myeloma include:

Deletion – A part of a chromosome is missing. For example: del(17p13) would mean that on chromosome 17, position 13 of the short arm is missing.

Translocation – A portion of one chromosome is transferred to another chromosome, or two chromosomes swap portions. For example, t(4;14) means that chromosomes 4 and 14 have swapped some of their genetic material.

Gain – There is an extra copy of a chromosome or part of a chromosome. For example: +1q21 would mean that this person has an extra copy of position 21 of the long region of chromosome 1.

Photo by slushpup on Flickr - some rights reserved.
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,


Related Articles:

3 Comments »

  • Jan Stafl said:

    Kudos to the Czechs! Unfortunately, since novel agents were not used in these pts. dx from 2002 to 2007, the data is of limited use now. One question: what is the definition of "complex karyotype" used by these researchers? Is it any three or more chromosomal abnormalities?
    By the way, I must disclose that I was born in Prague, so that explains my affinity for these researchers! Jan Štafl

  • Boris Simkovich said:

    Thanks for your comments, Jan.

    I'm not sure I'd go so far as to say that the data from this study are "of limited use." Will the data that we currently have for patients being treated with the latest novel agents be "of limited use" when the next proteasome inhibitor or immunomodulatory drugs come on the market? Will the advent of HDAC-inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies as myeloma treatments make data like these irrelevant?

    I don't really think so.

    True, the data from the Czech study need to be interpreted with caution. Newer therapies change the way we look at these kinds of results. But the findings still give us useful insights into what sort of abnormalities are "tough to treat" and which ones aren't.

    To your question about "complex karyotype" -- yes, the definition the researchers used was as described in the article above. Patients were considered to have a "complex karyotype" if they had three or more abnormalities.

    Given that you were born in Prague, Jan, perhaps you can keep Myeloma Beacon readers posted now and then on what the Czech myeloma researchers are up to. The Czech Myeloma Group, as it's known, is quite active and it's done some interesting stuff.

  • Jan Stafl said:

    Thank you Boris for your comments. I have exchanged emails with Prof. Hajek in Brno CZ, and he invited me to come to a conference there next April to discuss my experiences in Oregon as a doctor and a MM patient. I hope to make it after my ASCT in Portland, which should start on Jan. 24, after stem cell harvest right after the New Year. My question with the complex karyotype is that there must be low and high risk subtypes in this group, which I fit in. Does detailed genetic sequencing affect the chosen course of therapy? I just finished six cycles of VRD induction therapy, and will have arepeat bone marrow biopsy next week. I know that opinions for further Rx vary from just maintenance therapy with Revlimid, to tandem transplants, incl. Mini allo. Thank you and Happy St. Nicholas Day! Jan