Aredia Does Not Prevent Disease Progression In Smoldering Myeloma Patients

According to a recent study, the bisphosphonate Aredia reduces skeletal-related events, such as bone lesions and bone fractures, in patients with smoldering multiple myeloma; however, it does not prevent disease progression to symptomatic myeloma.
According to the study authors, these findings are consistent with the findings of previous studies that had shorter follow-up times.
Bone disease is frequently associated with multiple myeloma and can cause bone pain and fractures (see related Beacon news). While the symptoms of bone disease can be treated with radiation therapy and surgical procedures, bisphosphonates are currently the only available treatment that can prevent bone disease.
Aredia (pamidronate) is a bisphosphonate commonly used to prevent bone disease in multiple myeloma patients. It is administered intravenously once a month.
Although bisphosphonates do not treat the underlying causes of multiple myeloma, recent studies have demonstrated that bisphosphonate treatment may provide a survival advantage in myeloma patients (see related Beacon news).
The goal of this study was to determine if bisphosphonate treatment, specifically treatment with Aredia, would affect the progression of smoldering myeloma to symptomatic myeloma.
The study included 177 smoldering multiple myeloma patients, 89 of whom received 90 mg of Aredia once a month for one year. Aredia was administered as an intravenous infusion in an outpatient setting. The remaining 88 patients did not receive Aredia treatment and were observed. The researchers followed and evaluated all patients for five years.
The researchers found that 62.9 percent of patients who received Aredia treatment progressed to symptomatic myeloma, compared to 62.5 percent of patients who did not receive Aredia treatment. The median progression-free survival was 46 months for Aredia-treated patients and 48 months for untreated patients.
Although Aredia treatment did not improve progression to symptomatic myeloma, it did significantly reduce skeletal-related events that occurred at the time of disease progression. Skeletal-related events were defined as bone lesions, bone fractures, and/or high calcium levels in the blood.
In the Aredia group, 39.2 percent experienced skeletal-related events at the time of disease progression, compared to 72.2 percent of untreated patients.
The researcher pointed out that Aredia caused few side effects. Three patients interrupted treatment due to fever or severe low blood pressure.
In particular, the researchers did not observe any cases of low calcium levels or osteonecrosis of the jaw, a condition that is associated with a loss of blood supply to the jaw resulting in jawbone death.
For more information, see the research article in Leukemia & Lymphoma (abstract).okay
Related Articles:
- Early Use Of Radiation Therapy Associated With Shorter Survival In Multiple Myeloma
- Sustained Complete Response To Initial Treatment Associated With Substantial Survival Benefit In Multiple Myeloma
- Researchers Shed More Light On Risk Of MGUS In Close Relatives Of People With Multiple Myeloma
- Stem Cell Transplantation May Be Underutilized In Multiple Myeloma Patients In Their 80s
- Recently Diagnosed Myeloma Patients Very Likely To Have Low Testosterone Levels, Study Finds
I am still in the dark about my condition Myeloma.How long do i have to live and at what level of quality of life ???
Thank you Joey
You need to spend some time reading this site, and you will obtain more than enough information.
That said, the only thing that is certain is that there is not certainty. Some patients will full-blown myeloma respond well to treatment and appear to be cured, hence living a full-life.
Educating yourself will provide you with comfort, power, and the tools to make informed, rationale decisions in the future.
Hi Joey!
Prognosis is variable depending on disease aggressiveness, and whether you are high or low risk. At present, folks with MM that are standard risk, can look forward to at least 10 years. Awesome, no? And that may be lengthened depending on the new therapies that are available.
You have not provided enough information to give a more detailed question. I suggest you post your personal profile in the forum and you will likely learn a lot more than you may even desire to know.
Wishing you well.
Get new Myeloma Beacon articles by email.