Has anyone had a CT scan after three months of treatment? My oncologist says it is not necessary as the blood work up gives them all the info they need to determine how the body is doing against it's fight against myeloma?
Thanks
Forums
-

Tom74 - Name: Tom Meredith
- Who do you know with myeloma?: Me
- When were you/they diagnosed?: 9/5/15
- Age at diagnosis: 73
Re: CT scan after 3 months of treatment?
Uh, are you being seen at all by a myeloma specialist ?
While I am not a doctor, I do believe that MRI, CT, and PET scans all have a place in neoplasm surveillance (e.g., PET scan for nonsecretory myeloma).
While I am not a doctor, I do believe that MRI, CT, and PET scans all have a place in neoplasm surveillance (e.g., PET scan for nonsecretory myeloma).
-

Little Monkey - Name: Little Monkey
- Who do you know with myeloma?: Father-stage 1 multiple myeloma
- When were you/they diagnosed?: March/April of 2015
Re: CT scan after 3 months of treatment?
Yes, seeing a medical oncologist. Will see him again next Thursday and ask again.
Thanks for the reply
Tom74
Thanks for the reply
Tom74
-

Tom74 - Name: Tom Meredith
- Who do you know with myeloma?: Me
- When were you/they diagnosed?: 9/5/15
- Age at diagnosis: 73
Re: CT scan after 3 months of treatment?
Tom74-
Being a medical oncologist does not necessarily mean that your oncologist is a myeloma specialist. By definition a medical oncologist treats people with all kinds of cancer diagnoses. A myeloma specialist is a medical oncologist who only treats people with myeloma and usually does research in the field of myeloma.
If you haven't consulted with a myeloma specialist, I would suggest that you do. The specialist doesn't have to be the oncologist that you see on a regular basis, but usually will consult with your local oncologist to coordinate your care.
All the best,
Nancy in Phila
Being a medical oncologist does not necessarily mean that your oncologist is a myeloma specialist. By definition a medical oncologist treats people with all kinds of cancer diagnoses. A myeloma specialist is a medical oncologist who only treats people with myeloma and usually does research in the field of myeloma.
If you haven't consulted with a myeloma specialist, I would suggest that you do. The specialist doesn't have to be the oncologist that you see on a regular basis, but usually will consult with your local oncologist to coordinate your care.
All the best,
Nancy in Phila
-

NStewart - Name: Nancy Stewart
- Who do you know with myeloma?: self
- When were you/they diagnosed?: 3/08
- Age at diagnosis: 60
Re: CT scan after 3 months of treatment?
I agree with Nancy, you should be seeing a myeloma specialist, even if it is just to advise your oncologist how to proceed. Myeloma and its cousins are a bit of a different breed.
-

Little Monkey - Name: Little Monkey
- Who do you know with myeloma?: Father-stage 1 multiple myeloma
- When were you/they diagnosed?: March/April of 2015
Re: CT scan after 3 months of treatment?
I never had a CT scan at all for multiple myeloma. My doctor was a myeloma specialist as was the one I saw for my stem cell transplant. So no CT, no PET, and no MRI. Only bloodwork.
Patty
Patty
Re: CT scan after 3 months of treatment?
I believe with any imaging a medical provider should always be able to tell the patient why the imaging is being done, what the goal and purpose is. I believe it is common practice for all of those with active myeloma at initial diagnosis to at least have a whole body x-ray done to assess bone and skeletal damage, and MRI would could even be better but much more costly. Did you have any of this done?
A CT scan will have a higher, often significantly higher radiation dose than other imaging techniques. I do not believe they should be done unless there is a sound reason to do so. I would be cautious about pushing a medical provider for imaging like a CT scan without specific reason such as you feel you may have bone damage. If you interested in learning more about using imaging to track how well your body is doing against myeloma do some research into PET scan, a CT scan is not very useful for tracking disease progression.
I am not a doctor but I believe you oncologist is providing sound reasoning and is consistent with my own treatment experience.
A CT scan will have a higher, often significantly higher radiation dose than other imaging techniques. I do not believe they should be done unless there is a sound reason to do so. I would be cautious about pushing a medical provider for imaging like a CT scan without specific reason such as you feel you may have bone damage. If you interested in learning more about using imaging to track how well your body is doing against myeloma do some research into PET scan, a CT scan is not very useful for tracking disease progression.
I am not a doctor but I believe you oncologist is providing sound reasoning and is consistent with my own treatment experience.
-

Eric Hofacket - Name: Eric H
- When were you/they diagnosed?: 01 April 2011
- Age at diagnosis: 44
Re: CT scan after 3 months of treatment?
Tom,
This is a very good article by Dr. Kapoor on the various imaging modalities (including pros and cons) that can be used with multiple myeloma patients at various stages of their disease.
https://myelomabeacon.org/forum/pet-scans-for-multiple-myeloma-t3687.html
This is a very good article by Dr. Kapoor on the various imaging modalities (including pros and cons) that can be used with multiple myeloma patients at various stages of their disease.
https://myelomabeacon.org/forum/pet-scans-for-multiple-myeloma-t3687.html
-

Multibilly - Name: Multibilly
- Who do you know with myeloma?: Me
- When were you/they diagnosed?: Smoldering, Nov, 2012
Re: CT scan after 3 months of treatment?
I have PET scans every 3 months. My blood work is drawn every 3 months as well. Between both, we have a working knowledge of progression of lesions, or if they are stable. This is not able to be seen through blood work alone. My wife and I weighed the pro's and con's of the radiation levels introduced into my body through the scans, but have found that it was worth it. They were able to detect new lesions, and then I was able to discuss treatment options with my radiation oncologist, and also my myeloma oncologist.
I was diagnosed in February of 2015, and I have only had radiation treatments up until this coming Friday, where I am going to start a Velcade, dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide treatment. 1x per week injection, pill, pill.
I would still think it worth discussing with your oncologist and doing what you feel is in your best interest. I can say that each PET scan I do is close to $6K, but fortunately my insurance covers a majority of the cost, but that is a huge factor in determining a direction.
I was diagnosed in February of 2015, and I have only had radiation treatments up until this coming Friday, where I am going to start a Velcade, dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide treatment. 1x per week injection, pill, pill.
I would still think it worth discussing with your oncologist and doing what you feel is in your best interest. I can say that each PET scan I do is close to $6K, but fortunately my insurance covers a majority of the cost, but that is a huge factor in determining a direction.
-

JWOE43 - Name: Justin
- Who do you know with myeloma?: Myself
- When were you/they diagnosed?: Feb 2015
- Age at diagnosis: 40
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to Treatments & Side Effects
